Do Cognitive Functions Belong in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Model? A Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21786478 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Whitney R Ringwald (0000-0002-8883-5963, University of Minnesota, corresponding author), Amitai Abramovitch (0000-0001-9640-0970, Texas State University), Joost A Agelink van Rentergem (0000-0002-1600-8635, The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Roman Kotov (0000-0001-9569-8381, Stony Brook University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1049-1064 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Psychological Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1745-6916 • E-ISSN: 1745-6924 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/17456916251347926 |
| PMID | 40690691 |
| OpenAlex | W4412531426 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 102 |
Cognitive dysfunction is essential to conceptualizing, defining, and assessing much of psychopathology. Despite this prominence, cognitive abilities are not included in the prevailing empirically based classification system: the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). This gap exists because the factor-analytic literature the HiTOP is based on has solely used reporter measures rather than neuropsychological tests needed to measure cognitive ability. Given HiTOP’s influence on research and clinical practice, the omission of cognitive functions from the model is consequential. This study aimed to determine how cognitive abilities fit into the empirical structure of psychopathology with a meta-analytic joint factor analysis. We pooled data from three published meta-analyses into a single correlation matrix of eight disorders from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and seven cognitive functions. We then fit a series of models to the meta-analytic correlation matrix using exploratory factor analysis and correlated factors across levels to estimate the hierarchical structure. The highest level of the model included a general factor with strong loadings of all disorders and cognitive functions (median λ = |.51|, range = |.30| to |.64|). At the lowest level were three superspectra: psychosis and cognitive dysfunction, externalizing, and emotional dysfunction. Our results show cognitive abilities can be integrated into the HiTOP model and point to actionable next steps in research to accomplish this goal
Biology · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Meta-analysis · Psychopathology · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Mental Health Research Topics · Neuroscience · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Ecology
The p Factor
The Prevalence and Correlates of Eating Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Longitudinal Assessment of Mental Health Disorders and Comorbidities Across 4 Decades Among Participants in the Dunedin Birth Cohort Study
Cognitive impairment in depression
Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
All for One and One for All
Executive Function and Psychopathology
Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)
Use of the Extreme Groups Approach
Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems
Significance Tables for the Biserial and the Point Biserial
Leveraging economic games to integrate and differentiate personality and psychopathology
Major depressive disorder is associated with broad impairments on neuropsychological measures of executive function
Are psychotic psychopathology and neurocognition orthogonal? A systematic review of their associations
A meta-analytic review of the relationship between explicit memory bias and depression
Anxiety and working memory capacity
| Highly cited | No |
|---|