Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Equality and Equity in Compensating Patient Engagement in Research

A Plea for Exceptionalism

Bibliographic Data

ID21787563
AuthorsJean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon (0000-0002-8965-8153, Harvard Law School, corresponding author), Vincent Couture (0000-0002-8811-0524, Université Laval), Marie-Christine Roy (Université de Montréal), Marie‐Christine Roy (0000-0002-1803-4079, Université de Montréal)
Year2022
Volume18
Issue2
Pages126-131
Publication date2022-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueResearch Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-0161 • E-ISSN: 2047-6094
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17470161211059993
OpenAlexW3212272605
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited10

Engaging citizens and patients in research has become a truism in many fields of health research. It is now seen as a laudable—if not compulsory—activity in research for yielding more impactful and meaningful citizen/patient outcomes and steering research in the right direction. Although this research approach is increasingly common and commendable, we recently encountered a major obstacle in obtaining an ethics certificate from an institutional review board (IRB) to conduct a study that places citizen/patient perspectives on equal footing with those of academic/policy experts. The obstacle was the interpretation of fairness in terms of compensation for research participation (i.e. honoraria). In terms of research ethics, this raised an important question: Should all types of participants be compensated equally, or should exceptions be made for citizen/patient participants? We argue that there are good reasons for exceptionalism and that clearer guidance on citizen/patient engagement in research should be embedded into research ethics doctrine

Doctrine · Exceptionalism · Normative · Plea · Political science · Public relations · Research ethics · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Equitable payments for research participation

    Open Access•Lisa M Rasmussen, Elizabeth D Jones et al.•Research Ethics•2025

  • What guidance exists to support patient partner compensation practices? A scoping review of available policies and guidelines

    Open Access•Grace Fox, Dean Fergusson et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • Patient partner perspectives on compensation

    Open Access•Roma Dhamanaskar, Laura Tripp et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • The Importance of Lived Experience

    Open Access•Heather Mah, Ruth Dobson et al.•Health Expectations•2025

  • Our Voices Will Get Louder

    Open Access•Siwaar Abouhala, Aber Abdulle et al.•Journal of Racial and Ethnic…•2024

  • Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment

    Open Access•Joanna Crocker, Anne‐marie Boylan et al.•Health Expectations•2017

  • An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research

    Open Access•Clayon B Hamilton, Alison M Hoens et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • Patient and service user engagement in research

    Open Access•Nathan D Shippee, Juan Pablo Domecq Garces et al.•Health Expectations•2015

Citations per year2.5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae