Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stakeholders’ experiences of ethical challenges in cluster randomized trials in a limited resource setting

A qualitative analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID21787591
AuthorsTiwonge Mtande (0000-0003-1706-6615, Stellenbosch University, corresponding author), Chantal Lombard (0000-0002-2136-6533, South African Medical Research Council), Gonasagrie Nair (0000-0001-9005-2442, Stellenbosch University), Rennie (0000-0003-3844-972X, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Stuart Rennie (Stellenbosch University)
Year2024
Volume20
Issue1
Pages64-78
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueResearch Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-0161 • E-ISSN: 2047-6094
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17470161231191247
PMID40370421
OpenAlexW4385875015
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited22

Although the use of the cluster randomized trial (CRT) design to evaluate vaccines, public health interventions or health systems is increasing, the ethical issues posed by the design are not adequately addressed, especially in low- and middle-income country settings (LMICs). To help reveal ethical challenges, qualitative interviews were conducted with key stakeholders experienced in designing and conducting two selected CRTs in Malawi. The 18 interviewed stakeholders included investigators, clinicians, nurses, data management personnel and community workers who were invited to share their experiences related to implementation of CRTs. Data analysis revealed five major themes with ethical implications: (1) The moral obligation for health care providers to participate in health research and its compensation; (2) Suboptimal care services compromising the integrity of CRT; (3) Ensuring scientific validity and withholding care service; (4) Obtaining valid consent and permission for waiver of consent; and (5) Inadequate risk assessment for trial participation. Understanding key ethical issues posed by CRTs in Malawi could improve ethical review and research oversight of this particular study design

Alternative medicine · Informed consent · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Qualitative research · Research design · Research ethics · Sociology · Waiver · Ethics in Clinical Research · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

  • Advancing Doctoral and Postdoctoral International Bioethics Training Programs Supported by the D43 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Fogarty Mechanism

    Open Access•Connie M Ulrich, Joseph Ali et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2025

  • Ethical Oversight of Public Health Research

    Leslie London, Comm Health•American Journal of Public Health•2002

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae