Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reshaping consent so we might improve participant choice (II) – helping people decide

Bibliographic Data

ID21787610
AuthorsHugh Davies (0000-0003-3060-166X, Committee on Publication Ethics, corresponding author), Rosie Munday (Committee on Publication Ethics), Maeve O’Reilly (0000-0002-2702-397X, University College London), Catriona Gilmour Hamilton (Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust), Arzhang Ardahan (University of Oxford), Simon Kolstoe (0000-0003-1472-3966, University of Portsmouth), Katie Gillies (0000-0001-7890-2854, University of Aberdeen)
Year2023
Volume19
Issue4
Pages466-473
Publication date2023-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueResearch Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-0161 • E-ISSN: 2047-6094
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17470161231176932
OpenAlexW4380371608
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

Research consent processes must provide potential participants with the necessary information to help them decide if they wish to join a study. On the Oxford ‘A’ Research Ethics Committee we’ve found that current research proposals mostly provide adequate detail (even if not in an easily comprehensible format), but often fail to support decision making, a view supported by published evidence. In a previous paper, we described how consent might be structured, and here we develop the concept of an Information and Decision Aid (IDA) that can support decision making and be used to guide the dialogue between researcher and potential participant. Our proposal requires limited changes to current processes or paperwork and would provide an easily accessible document for others that the potential participant might approach for advice. It could later be integrated with the Informed Consent Form to ensure all matters of concern to the individual participant have been addressed before consent is formally signed off

Alternative medicine · Engineering ethics · Informed consent · Internet privacy · Knowledge management · Management science · Participant observation · Sociology · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Psychology

  • Reshaping consent so we might improve participant choice (III) – How is the research participant’s understanding currently checked and how might we improve this process

    Open Access•Hugh Davies, Simon Kolstoe et al.•Research Ethics•2024

  • Weighing Open Science Against Research Participation Burden in Informed Consent

    Open Access•Renata Iskander, Patrick Bodilly Kane et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2025

  • Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”

    Raanan Gillon•Journal of Medical Ethics•2003

  • Interventions to Improve Research Participants' Understanding in Informed Consent for Research

    James Flory, Ezekiel J Emanuel et al.•JAMA•2004

  • Reshaping the review of consent so we might improve participant choice

    Open Access•Hugh Davies•Research Ethics•2022

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae