Authorship order and effects of changing bibliometrics practices
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21787672 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gert Helgesson (0000-0002-0075-0165, Karolinska Institutet, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 1-7 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Research Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1747-0161 • E-ISSN: 2047-6094 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1747016119898403 |
| OpenAlex | W3003078102 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 21 |
Although the authorship order on published research plays a significant role for scientific merit in many research contexts, and therefore should be handled with great care not least for the sake of fairness, the practices of accrediting authorship positions vary greatly between different research areas. This paper makes the point, by help of a current example, that changes in bibliometrics practices may make an already disparate landscape even more confusing
Bibliometrics · Business · Data science · Engineering ethics · Library science · Management science · Sociology · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Community-Led Health Initiatives for Torres Straits Island Communities in a Changing Climate
Virtue Signaling
Estimating transformative agreement impact on hybrid open access
Do prolific arts and humanities authors have publishing preferences
Authorship order and performance from the perspective of field and academic capital
Losing young researchers in the authorship battle, under-reported casualties
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |