How AI’s reporting Differs
Evidence of Themes, Emotions, and Representation of Social Actors
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21788705 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gong Chen (0009-0009-2924-5486, University of International Business and Economics), Jiliang Sha (University of International Business and Economics, corresponding author), Li Liu (0000-0002-5257-3391, University of International Business and Economics) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-2786 • E-ISSN: 1751-2794 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2026.2700244 |
| OpenAlex | W7167575876 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
The rapid emergence of generative AI models in the media sector necessitates a critical examination of the reporting they produce. In this context, we focus on the refugee crisis arising from the Russia–Ukraine conflict, a highly contentious global issue, as the subject of analysis. Employing an interdisciplinary methodology, this study integrates corpus tools, LDA modeling, emotional analysis, and critical discourse analysis to systematically compare the reporting patterns of three generative AI models (GPT-4, Claude 3.5 and Gemini1.5) with three mainstream media agencies (CBS, CNN and Fox). Analyzing 150 media reports and 150 AI-generated articles, our quantitative and qualitative findings reveal distinct differences in reporting on Ukrainian refugees. AI models tend to avoid political reporting and adopt a more “humanized” tone, with lower scores for fear emotions and higher anticipation scores compared to traditional media. In terms of the representation of social actors, AI-generated content demonstrates a greater reliance on categorization and assimilation. These findings provide critical insights into the unique characteristics of AI-generated reporting and their potential implications for media discourse
Journalism · Perception · Social media · Social representation · AI in Service Interactions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Discourse and Practice
When White reporters cover race
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum
Non-normal data
Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey
Can AI tell good stories? Narrative transportation and persuasion with ChatGPT
Emotionalisation of contemporary media discourse
Visual Framing of the Rohingya Refugees
Collaborating With ChatGPT
Automated journalism
Structure and Content of the Discourse on Climate Change in the Blogosphere
In principle obstacles for empathic AI
Newsmakers
The Ethical Revolution
One Size Fits Some
Worthy and Unworthy Refugees
Public Perceptions and Attitudes Towards the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism
Old Threats, New Name? Generative AI and Visual Journalism
News and Islamist Radicalization Processes
Unequal Framing in Times of Hardship? How Newspapers from Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom and Switzerland Portray Syrian and Ukrainian Refugees – Evidence from a Deductive and Inductive Automated Content Analysis
Analysis of Linguistic Complexity in Professional and Citizen Media
LiveJournal Libra!’
Deconstructing competing courtroom narratives
ChatGPT-4 as a journalist
The value of emotion
ChatGPT in the public eye
Refugees from Ukraine are called humans
The visual dehumanisation of refugees
Comparing the representation of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants in the Irish and UK press
Framing
Trends in the Turn to Affect
AI will never convey the essence of human empathy
Representing people in execution news
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |