Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

‘Carbon’ in forest carbon projects

Evidence from India

Bibliographic Data

ID21791919
AuthorsAshish Aggarwal (0000-0002-2838-7409, Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume14
Issue7
Pages625-634
Publication date2022-08-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueClimate and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1756-5529 • E-ISSN: 1756-5537
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17565529.2021.1956873
OpenAlexW3193601990
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited32

This research assesses the carbon claims of two forest carbon projects in the states of Haryana and Himachal Pradesh in India, which are being supported by European Union and World Bank respectively. This research finds that both the projects had sequestered only 37% and 3% of the carbon estimated in the project documents up to their first verification period. Only one of the projects i.e., Himachal Pradesh project could earn 38% of the projected credits. Haryana project could not claim carbon credits as more than half of the participants had left the project due to various issues. Haryana and Himachal projects have reported high costs of USD 0.5 million and USD 1.83 million respectively. Both the projects have become unsustainable early in their lifecycle due to low or no carbon revenues, high costs and other governance issues. The available empirical evidence from across the globe also suggests high costs and mixed results on carbon from the forest carbon projects. Hence, it is imperative to revisit the established narrative of ‘big and cheap carbon’ with the robust empirical evidence before further scaling up of the forest carbon projects

Business · Carbon credit · Carbon fibers · Carbon finance · Carbon market · Corporate governance · Economics · Empirical evidence · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Revenue · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · Mathematics · Ecology · Finance

  • Predicting wasteful spending in tree planting programs in Indian Himalaya

    Open Access•Pushpendra Rana, Forrest Fleischman et al.•World Development•2022

  • Are forest carbon projects in Africa green but mean

    Open Access•Dominique V Schmid•Climate and Development•2023

  • Why carbon offsets may fail in complex systems

    Open Access•Pushpendra Rana, Forrest Fleischman et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2026

  • Balancing greenwashing risks and forest carbon sequestration benefits

    Open Access•Ram Ranjan•Forest Policy and Economics•2024

  • The Economics of Climate Change

    Open Access•Nicholas Stern, Paul Warde•Economics of Climate Change•2007

  • Cash for carbon

    Open Access•Seema Jayachandran, Joost De Laat et al.•Science•2017

  • Comparing methods for assessing the effectiveness of subnational Redd+ initiatives

    Open Access•Astrid Bos, Astrid B Bos et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Balance sheet in the Redd

    Open Access•Mattia Fosci•Ecological Economics•2013

  • What is Redd+ achieving on the ground

    Open Access•A E Duchelle, Gabriela Simonet et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2018

  • How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks

    Open Access•G Cornelis Van Kooten, Alison J Eagle et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2004

  • Improving forest governance or messing it up? Analyzing impact of forest carbon projects on existing governance mechanisms with evidence from India

    Open Access•Ashish Aggarwal•Forest Policy and Economics•2019

  • Insights from the ground level? A content analysis review of multi-national Redd+ studies since 2010

    Open Access•Richard Fischer, Yvonne Hargita et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • Deforestation and the Paris climate agreement

    Open Access•Jeremy Hein, Alejandro Guarín et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Estimating the opportunity costs of activities that cause degradation in tropical dry forest

    Open Access•Armonia Borrego, Margaret Skutsch•Ecological Economics•2014

  • Carbon Forestry and Sociospatial Difference

    David M Lansing, David Lansing•Society & Natural Resources•2015

  • Agrarian livelihoods under siege

    Open Access•Moses Mosonsieyiri Kansanga, Moses Kansanga et al.•World Development•2018

  • Promising Change, Delivering Continuity

    Open Access•Jens Friis Lund, Eliezeri Sungusia et al.•World Development•2016

  • Estimating Smallholder Opportunity Costs of Redd

    Open Access•Amy Ickowitz, Erin Sills et al.•World Development•2017

  • Linking Mitigation and Adaptation in Carbon Forestry Projects

    Open Access•Rico Kongsager, Esteve Corbera•World Development•2015

  • Reducing or creating poverty? Analyzing livelihood impacts of forest carbon projects with evidence from India

    Open Access•Ashish Aggarwal, Dan Brockington•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Roots of inequity

    Open Access•Susan Chomba, Juliet Kariuki et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Is Redd+ effective, efficient, and equitable? Learning from a Redd+ project in Northern Cambodia

    Open Access•Iben Nathan, M Pasgaard•Geoforum•2017

  • Costs, cobenefits, and community responses to Redd

    Open Access•Bishnu Prasad Sharma, Priya Shyamsundar et al.•Conservation Ecology•2017

  • Land tenure and Redd

    Open Access•Allan Larson, Anne M Larson et al.•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • Balancing carrots and sticks in Redd

    Open Access•A E Duchelle, Claudio De Sassi et al.•Conservation Ecology•2017

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae