Algorithmic ethical silence
How opaque platform governance produces moral self-censorship and weakens accountability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21795641 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dinesh Kumar (0000-0003-1438-9427, Woxsen School of Business, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1758-8871 • E-ISSN: 1477-996X |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jices-01-2026-0016 |
| OpenAlex | W7166745184 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Purpose This paper aims to develop the concept of algorithmic ethical silence. It explains how opaque platform governance can produce moral self-censorship even without direct takedowns or explicit sanctions. Design/methodology/approach The study is conceptual. It synthesises scholarship on silence and self-censorship with research on chilling effects. It also synthesises work on platform governance and algorithmic opacity. Then it builds an integrative mechanism model and propositions. Findings The paper specifies a three-part mechanism. Opacity constrains users’ causal inference about why visibility changes. Probabilistic enforcement produces anticipatory compliance under uncertainty. Metricised visibility turns moral expression into reputational and sometimes economic exposure. Together these conditions shift silence from an interpersonal reaction to a system-produced ethical condition. Research limitations/implications The paper does not test the model empirically. It offers propositions and boundary conditions that can guide qualitative process tracking, comparative platform studies and audit-informed designs. It can connect perceived governance conditions to patterns of withheld moral speech. Practical implications Platforms can reduce ethical silence through actionable explanations and appeals. It can help regulators with audits of visibility interventions. Social implications Algorithm-based ethical silence can reduce the moral vocabulary of people. It is capable of undermining dissent signalling. It can also reduce perceived accountability by discouraging public moral critique. Originality/value The concept of algorithmic ethical silence specifies a distinct mechanism through which opaque governance can reduce morally explicit voice without takedowns. It theorises how opacity, probabilistic enforcement and metricised visibility jointly shift silence from an interpersonal choice to a system-produced ethical condition. It also provides discriminators and boundary conditions that enable empirical falsification across platforms
Accountability · Business ethics · Corporate governance · Enforcement · Network governance · Scholarship · Silence · Visibility · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
The Platform Society
The emotional dog and its rational tail
Prospect Theory
The Black Box Society
Silenced on social media
From content moderation to visibility moderation
“Shadowbanning is not a thing”
The Spiral of Silence a Theory of Public Opinion
Lawless
Employee Voice and Silence
Opaque algorithms, transparent biases
Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip
Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook
Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities
Algorithmic content moderation
How the machine 'thinks
| Highly cited | No |
|---|