The Effect of Oral Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback on Learners’ Knowledge of Pronoun among Iranian EFL Learners
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21806114 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fatemeh Azimi Amoli (Ilam University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 672 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692 |
| Publisher | Academy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17507/tpls.1006.07 |
| OpenAlex | W3030823605 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 15 |
A great number of language learners claims that they are unable to produce the foreign language accurately without any grammatical errors at the end of their language course. In this study, the impact of oral metalinguistic corrective feedback, among various types of corrective feedback, on learners’ pronoun accuracy was considered. The participants were 74 EFL learners (46 females, 28 males) studying English at Safir English language institutes in Tehran. In order to homogenize the learners, Key English Test (KET) test was given to them. 60 learners were selected for the study and 14 learners were removed. Participants were randomly divided into two groups. One group received metalinguistic feedback and the other group received explicit correction feedback. Grammatical judgment test was used as a pretest and posttest. Eight reading passages from “Select Readings” were another instrument that was used for training through jigsaw task in this study. Then t-test was run to check the significance of the mean difference between pretest and post-test of groups. The results show the priority of experimental group (which received oral metalinguistic feedback) on control group (which received explicit feedback)
Corrective Feedback · Jigsaw · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Significant difference · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Mathematics · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Second Language Learning and Teaching
Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content
Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar
Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback
Evidence in support of written corrective feedback
Measuring Implicit and Explicit Linguistic Knowledge
A typology of written corrective feedback types
The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing
Reducing Composition Errors
The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing
Relative Effects of Explicit and Implicit Feedback
The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development
The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context
The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners' Acquisition of Articles
Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality
Error feedback in L2 writing classes
| Highly cited | No |
|---|