Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A BLEU-Based Evaluation of ChatGPT's Chinese-to-English Translation

Bibliographic Data

ID21806161
AuthorsLinli He (0000-0001-9297-4379, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia), Mozhgan Ghassemiazghandi (0000-0002-3038-3124, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue12
Pages4017-4026
Publication date2025-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692
PublisherAcademy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.17507/tpls.1512.21
OpenAlexW4416844053
LanguageEN

Political text translation presents unique challenges requiring precise ideological expression, cultural sensitivity, and terminological consistency—aspects that extend beyond conventional linguistic accuracy. While ChatGPT demonstrates growing capabilities in machine translation tasks, its performance in specialized political discourse remains underexplored. This study evaluates ChatGPT's Chinese-to-English translation quality using the 2023 Chinese Government Work Report, employing both BLEU metrics and human assessment across three criteria: syntax and grammar, cultural and ideological accuracy, and fluency and coherence. Three experienced translators evaluated ChatGPT's translations using a 6-point scale, while BLEU scores provided automated evaluation. Results reveal a significant contradiction: while BLEU scores remained low (0.31-0.37), human evaluation showed moderate performance with notable variations across criteria. ChatGPT achieved the highest scores in fluency and coherence (5.53 average) but struggled significantly with cultural and ideological accuracy (4.43 average), particularly in preserving political terminology precision and contextual appropriateness. Critical issues include generic translations of politically specific terms and inadequate handling of culturally embedded expressions. The study's key finding demonstrates that BLEU evaluation alone is fundamentally insufficient for assessing political text translation quality due to single-reference constraints and inability to capture ideological nuances. Our findings highlight the limitations of BLEU in evaluating politically nuanced texts and underscore the necessity of human evaluation for meaningful assessment of specialized domain translation. This research contributes to understanding AI translation capabilities in political discourse and provides evidence-based recommendations for developing more appropriate evaluation frameworks for specialized translation domains

Fluency · Ideology · Machine translation · Politics · Syntax · Terminology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae