Restoring Gilgamesh Through AI With a Negotiation Algorithm Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21806341 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ismail Abdulwahhab Ismail (0000-0001-6592-5846, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 3046-3056 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692 |
| Publisher | Academy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17507/tpls.1410.05 |
| OpenAlex | W4403105938 |
| Language | EN |
In this study, the AI tool ChatGPT is utilised to enhance Tablet 2 of the Epic of Gilgamesh by using a perfected approach for restoration. The proposed negotiation algorithm regulates the interaction of ChatGPT with a human expert and ensures that the words generated are stylistically suitable. ChatGPT employs an interactive scheme, proposing different alternatives for each missing line, and the human specialist evaluates these alternatives in terms of their coherence, consistency, and adherence to the story. The expert evaluation is the key factor in the improvement of the text generation process, as this evaluation increases the restoration efficiency. This combination of AI and human intelligence, in turn, refines Tablet 2 by obtaining more accurate paragraphs and, thus, making the restoration more appropriate. Through this model, ChatGPT not only helps with the comprehension of the epic but also provides new insights into the work’s literary and historical importance. The negotiation algorithm is an outstanding method that may provide a better understanding of the whole work by providing new insights. This study reveals the possibility of using the collaboration between AI and human thinking in the field of literary restoration, which represents a new direction for understanding and enjoying ancient literary texts
Algorithm · Negotiation · Social science · Sociology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
| Highly cited | No |
|---|