Agenda-Setting Analysis of Media Representations

This study employs Agenda-Setting Theory to examine the portrayal of Islam and Muslims in two influential newspapers, DAWN (Pakistan) and The Times (United Kingdom). Utilizing a comparative content analysis, the research explores how media narratives shape public perceptions by emphasizing particular themes and attributes. The findings reveal a stark contrast in agenda-setting priorities: while DAWN foregrounds narratives of empowerment, resilience, and solidarity, The Times frequently frames Islam within a securitized discourse, linking Muslim identity to issues of integration and national security. Through the lens of first- and second-level agenda-setting, this study demonstrates how these divergent representations reflect broader socio-political ideologies, reinforcing or challenging systemic biases. Moreover, the analysis highlights how linguistic and thematic framing choices influence policy discourse, shaping public attitudes toward Muslims in their respective national contexts. By deconstructing editorial tendencies, this research contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate on media responsibility, cultural representation, and the role of journalism in fostering or mitigating Islamophobic sentiments. The study manages to underline the educative role of media in intercultural learning and policy development

Islam · Islamophobia · Journalism · Narrative · National identity · Perception · Public discourse · Media Studies and Communication · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East