Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Normative Versus Geopolitical Aspects of the Eu Enlargment Process (Slovak and Macedonian Case)

Bibliographic Data

ID21817738
AuthorsJordanka GALEVA (Goce Delcev University), Pavol Struhár (Trencianska Univerzita Alexandra Dubceka V Trencine)
Year2026
Volume27
Issue27
Pages179
Publication date2026-06-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBalkan Social Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1857-8772 • E-ISSN: 1857-8799
PublisherGoce Delchev University - Shtip (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.46763/bssr262727179g
OpenAlexW7167055931
LanguageEN
References cited9

This paper presents a comparative analysis of Macedonia and Slovakia in the context of European integration process, focusing on Copenhagen criteria condition of minority protection. This comparative analysis identifies key constraints and facilitating factors in both cases and situates them within intergovernmentalist and realist interpretations of EU enlargement, including its procedural standards and strategic considerations. In both countries, minority issues were condition for EU accession and addressed through legal measures. After resolving the Hungarian minority issue in Slovakia and the Albanian minority issue in Macedonia, Slovakia advanced to EU membership in 2004, while in Macedonia (fifteen years after receiving candidate status and prior to the opening of accession negotiations) in 2020, a new minority issue emerged and was introduced as a condition, delaying the country’s further progress in this process. By applying intergovernmental and realist theories, the analysis in this paper explores whether EU enlargement depends on common EU policies, i.e. formal criteria, or whether individual interests and policies have a greater impact. The findings show that in the Slovak case, in addition to standard criteria, the geopolitical context plays an influential role in the country’s integration, while the progress of North Macedonia’s accession, bilateral issues with certain EU member states are more considered than progress in fulfilling formal criteria. Overall, the results show that, in addition to legal standards, individual interests of certain countries and geopolitical factors can influence the pace and dynamics of EU enlargement

Accession · Geopolitics · Macedonian · Normative · Pace · Resizing · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · European Union Policy and Governance · Minority Rights and Languages

  • The Impact of Euroscepticism on the Eu Enlargement Policy in the Western Balkans

    Open Access•Tetiana Sydoruk, M M Yakymchuk et al.•Balkan Social Science Review•2022

  • The V4 and European Integration

    Open Access•Helena Bauerová•Politics in Central Europe•2018

  • Visegrád

    Csaba Törő, Eamonn Butler et al.•Europe Asia Studies•2013

  • The Visegrád Group in the Expanded European Union

    Open Access•Martin Dangerfield•East European Politics and…•2008

  • The Future of Slovakia and Its Relation to the European Union

    Open Access•Lucia Mokrá, Hana Kováčiková•Comparative Southeast European…•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae