Platforming pickiness
The Digitally Mediated Enactment of Childhood Avoidant Eating
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2181970 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Deville (0000-0003-0583-3493, Lancaster University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1-17 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Cultural Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1753-0350 • E-ISSN: 1753-0369 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17530350.2024.2336460 |
| OpenAlex | W4399320192 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 61 |
Steve Woolgar has argued that science and technology studies is a prime place for studying the relationship between children and consumption [2012 “Ontological Child Consumption.” In Situating Child Consumption: Rethinking Values and Notions of Children, Childhood and Consumption, edited by B. Sandin, A. Sparrman, and J. Sjöberg, 33–51. Lund: Nordic Academic Press]. Yet this project remains largely unfulfilled, mirroring the broader absence of children as a serious object of study in the discipline. This extends to the analysis of childhood eating. So-called ‘picky’ eating, which I refer to as ‘avoidant’ eating, involves varying degrees of food refusal, often experienced by carers as highly distressing. In response, many parents are turning to digital platforms for support. This paper analyses how parents’ encounters with avoidant eating become entangled with digital platforms, centring on a digital autoethnography of the author’s own information seeking practices via Google search. Not only does the paper respond to the neglect of parent–child relations as a site for research within STS, it also demonstrates that the so-called ‘new social studies of childhood’ could benefit from further analysing the way in which parent–child relations are entangled with relations between people and things, including digital platforms
Sociology · Child Development and Digital Technology · Eating Disorders and Behaviors · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Psychology
Feeding the family
Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood
Food and Femininity
The Logic of Care
Food, Morals and Meaning
Algorithms of Oppression
Beyond ‘voice’, beyond ‘agency’, beyond ‘politics’? Hybrid childhoods and some critical reflections on children's emotional geographies
The Relevance of Algorithms
Responsive Feeding Is Embedded in a Theoretical Framework of Responsive Parenting
The Affordances of Social Media Platforms
What is Cyber or Digital Autoethnography
Beyond platform-centrism and digital universalism
The Agency of Children
Child feeding practices and concerns
The lived experience of parenting a child with sensory sensitivity and picky eating
Fussy eating in toddlers
Facebook Feeds and Child Feeding
What’s the fuss about? Parent presentations of fussy eating to a parenting support helpline
How to do things with food
The Future of Childhood
An Ontological Turn for Childhood Studies
Rethinking children’s agency
Reconceptualizing power and gendered subjectivities in domestic cooking spaces
A call for research exploring social media influences on mothers' child feeding practices and childhood obesity risk
The Family Meal Framework
The healthy child citizen
Childhood Matters
I Eat an Apple. On Theorizing Subjectivities
After Method
Ontological turns, turnoffs and roundabouts
The politics of 'platforms
The wrong bin bag
The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization
Ethnography for the Internet
Governing Algorithms
Between technical features and analytic capabilities
How New Is the "New" Social Study of Childhood? The Myth of a Paradigm Shift
One button in my pocket instead of the smartphone
Enacting the overweight body in residential child care
Captivating algorithms
"You're Going to Do What?" Challenges of Autoethnography in the Academy
Pharmaceutical Matters
Defending Motherhood
Why is This a Battle Every Night
Debtor publics
The diverse domains of quantified selves
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |