Degrees of complexity in valency class systems
Implications for efficiency
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21820041 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sergey Say (0000-0001-8066-9166, University of Potsdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 607-661 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language Typology and Universals (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1867-8319 • E-ISSN: 2196-7148 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/stuf-2025-2022 |
| OpenAlex | W7124420246 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 70 |
The complexity of valency class systems remains an underexplored dimension of typological variation. Drawing on data from BivalTyp, a database cataloging valency patterns of 130 bivalent verbs across 120 languages, this paper proposes three metrics to quantify this complexity. Two of these metrics – the ratio of intransitive verbs among bivalent verbs and the entropy in the distribution of bivalent intransitive verbs across valency classes – are strongly positively correlated, reflecting different aspects of the overarching valency class complexity. The third metric, the entropy of all bivalent verbs across valency classes, captures both of these facets. Languages tend to gravitate toward moderate complexity values, avoiding overly simplistic or excessively complex valency class systems. However, significant variation exists, primarily driven by areal and genealogical factors. Valency class complexity, as measured and discussed in this paper, is empirically interwoven with numerous other parameters of morphosyntactic typology, suggesting that it is a fundamental factor in shaping linguistic diversity. Specifically, languages with large case inventories, a high prevalence of non-verbal predicates, and a preference for satellite-framed constructions in motion events are hypothesized to favor more complex valency class systems. Furthermore, complex argument-encoding devices tend to favor postverbal positions, aligning with the principles of incremental processing and the minimization of processing effort. Overall, this study contributes to understanding how efficiency pressures influence typological distributions
Regular language · Valency · Categorization, perception, and language · Language and cultural evolution · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency
The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity
Toward a Cognitive Semantics
Prototypical Transitivity
Redundancy and reduction
Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions
Data Analysis
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension
Welcome to the Tidyverse
LmerTest Package
Applicativizing preverbs in selected European languages
Syntax
Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time
Universal attractors in language evolution provide evidence for the kinds of efficiency pressures involved
A quantitative global test of the complexity trade-off hypothesis
Complexity trade-offs and equi-complexity in natural languages
Language use in a ‘one parent–one language’ Mandarin–English bilingual family
Word order in zero-marking languages
Semantic role clustering
The Distribution of Subject and Object Agreement and Word Order Type
Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable
Bivalent Verb Classes in the Languages of Europe
A typology of positional differential argument marking
The Nature and Dimensions of Complexity in Morphology
The typology of motion expressions revisited
Grammatical Relations Typology
Remarks on transitivity
The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity
On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology
The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Production
Ergativity in Pari, a nilotic OVS language
All Languages Are Equally Complex
Morphological Organization
The Acquisition of Subjecthood
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection
Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |