Beyond LLM output
How critical thinking shapes EFL students’ interaction with ChatGPT generated content
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21820103 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nawel Bengrait (University of Guelma, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Applied Linguistics Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1868-6303 • E-ISSN: 1868-6311 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/applirev-2025-0254 |
| OpenAlex | W7167687532 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
The increasing incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in education urges researchers to examine their efficiency in Foreign Language (FL) learning and teaching. Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are becoming inevitable in promoting English as a Foreign Language (EFL). However, concerns have been raised about overreliance on LLMs, which may hinder learners’ Critical Thinking (CT) abilities. This study explores the use of ChatGPT to develop students’ capacity for critically engaging with LLM-generated content and assessing their abilities in reflective learning, fact-checking, logical reasoning, and bias detection. Using convergent parallel mixed methods, including quantitative rubric-based assessment and qualitative response analysis, students’ interactions with the LLM are evaluated based on Paul and Elder’s (2013. Critical thinking : Intellectual standards essential to reasoning well within every domain of human thought. Journal of Developmental Education 37(1). 32–33) CT nine intellectual standards: clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, significance, depth, breadth, logic, and fairness. Findings reveal that while advanced students critically reflect on AI responses, lower-proficient learners often adopt them uncritically, highlighting a gap in fact-checking and AI literacy. Many students also struggle to detect inconsistencies or bias, underscoring the need for explicit instruction on AI ethics and limitations. The study concludes that AI is useful for language learning, but its effectiveness depends on learners’ ability to critically evaluate and refine its outputs
Applied linguistics · Content (measure theory) · Critical thinking · Domain (mathematical analysis) · Foreign language · Foreign language teaching · Language acquisition · Language education · Qualitative research · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · E-Learning and COVID-19 · Education and Critical Thinking Development
What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills
Conceptualizing AI literacy
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling
AI ‐Mediated Communication in EFL Classrooms
Investigating the Role of Multimodality in Promoting Algerian EFL Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Case Study
ChatGPT
AI Tools in Society
Defining higher order thinking
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |