Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond LLM output

How critical thinking shapes EFL students’ interaction with ChatGPT generated content

Bibliographic Data

ID21820103
AuthorsNawel Bengrait (University of Guelma, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-07-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueApplied Linguistics Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1868-6303 • E-ISSN: 1868-6311
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/applirev-2025-0254
OpenAlexW7167687532
LanguageEN
References cited23

The increasing incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in education urges researchers to examine their efficiency in Foreign Language (FL) learning and teaching. Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are becoming inevitable in promoting English as a Foreign Language (EFL). However, concerns have been raised about overreliance on LLMs, which may hinder learners’ Critical Thinking (CT) abilities. This study explores the use of ChatGPT to develop students’ capacity for critically engaging with LLM-generated content and assessing their abilities in reflective learning, fact-checking, logical reasoning, and bias detection. Using convergent parallel mixed methods, including quantitative rubric-based assessment and qualitative response analysis, students’ interactions with the LLM are evaluated based on Paul and Elder’s (2013. Critical thinking : Intellectual standards essential to reasoning well within every domain of human thought. Journal of Developmental Education 37(1). 32–33) CT nine intellectual standards: clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, significance, depth, breadth, logic, and fairness. Findings reveal that while advanced students critically reflect on AI responses, lower-proficient learners often adopt them uncritically, highlighting a gap in fact-checking and AI literacy. Many students also struggle to detect inconsistencies or bias, underscoring the need for explicit instruction on AI ethics and limitations. The study concludes that AI is useful for language learning, but its effectiveness depends on learners’ ability to critically evaluate and refine its outputs

Applied linguistics · Content (measure theory) · Critical thinking · Domain (mathematical analysis) · Foreign language · Foreign language teaching · Language acquisition · Language education · Qualitative research · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · E-Learning and COVID-19 · Education and Critical Thinking Development

  • What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations

    Open Access•Duri Long, Brian Magerko•Proceedings of the 2020 CHI…•2020

  • ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning

    Open Access•Lucas Kohnke, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse et al.•RELC Journal•2023

  • Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills

    Open Access•Ying Guo, Daniel Lee•Journal of Chemical Education•2023

  • Conceptualizing AI literacy

    Open Access•Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Jac Ka Lok Leung et al.•Computers and Education:…•2021

  • ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education

    Open Access•Enkelejda Kasneci, Kathrin Sessler et al.•Learning and Individual Differences•2023

  • A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

    Open Access•Terry K Koo, Mae Y Li•Journal of Chiropractic Medicine•2016

  • Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling

    Open Access•Ilker Etikan•American Journal of Theoretical…•2016

  • AI ‐Mediated Communication in EFL Classrooms

    Open Access•Honggang Liu, Jiqun Fan•European Journal of Education•2025

  • Investigating the Role of Multimodality in Promoting Algerian EFL Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Case Study

    Open Access•Rim Bougherara, Kamel Khaldi•Traduction et Langues•2021

  • ChatGPT

    Open Access•Jurgen Rudolph, Samson Tan et al.•Journal of Applied Learning &…•2023

  • AI Tools in Society

    Open Access•Michael Gerlich•Societies•2025

  • Defining higher order thinking

    Arthur Lewis, David Smith et al.•Theory Into Practice•1993

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae