Politics, Economy, and Çiftliks
The History of Four Çiftliks in Larissa (Yenişehir-i Fener)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21822657 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aysel Yıldız (0000-0002-0196-6064, corresponding author), Aysel Yildiz (Independent scholar, Istanbul, Turkey, [email protected]) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 28-65 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Turkish Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1877-5454 • E-ISSN: 1877-5462 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/18775462-bja10009 |
| OpenAlex | W3107120400 |
| Language | EN |
The Ottoman state authorities tried to prevent çiftlik formation in all parts of the empire. Yet, they also tried to keep this valuable and cash/kind-producing economic commodity under strict surveillance. The tax-farming and confiscation systems served as two important mechanisms of state control and ensured the state’s redistributive/reallocative role. Having the right to confiscate and redistribute estates, as well as being the ultimate decision maker in the tax-farming system, the Ottoman authorities acted as the chief regulator of the çiftlik market. Therefore, the central state was always a crucial party to be taken into consideration in the triangle of the çiftlik economy together with the peasantry and the çiftlik holders. This article provides a survey of four çiftlik s in Larissa (Yenişehir-i Fener), namely Yeğenli, Göçeri, Köleler, and Zaim, in order to understand the redistributive and reallocative role of the Ottoman imperial center and its impact on the history of the region
Cash · Commodity · Confiscation · Economic history · Economics · Economy · Market economy · Political science · Politics · Law · Linguistics and Cultural Studies · Ottoman and Turkish Studies · Ottoman Empire History and Society · Finance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |