Does the Brain Think

It is common in cognitive science to ascribe psychological predicates to the brain, i.e. to assert that the brain sees, feels, thinks, etc. This has prompted philosophical debate. According to the Nonsense View, the relevant locutions of cognitive scientists are nonsensical or false (Bennett and Hacker 2003, 2007). According to the Literal View, they are literal truths and report the psychological properties of brains (Dennett 2007; Crane 2015; Figdor 2018). In this paper, I propose the Synecdoche View, according to which cognitive scientists’ locutions are figurative, with ‘brain’ referring to the human being, such that ‘the brain thinks’ reports the thinking of the human being, not the thinking of the brain. I compare this view to the dominant views in the literature and argue that it is a plausible alternative. One consequence of this is that there is no reason to believe that the locutions of cognitive scientists indicate empirical support for the claim that brains possess psychological properties

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literal and figurative language · Metaphysics · Nonsense · Philosophy of mind · Philosophy of science · Action Observation and Synchronization · Neuroscience · Pain Management and Placebo Effect · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology

• What Are We?

  Eric T Olson•What are we?•2007

  Incluir item

• Truthfulness and Relevance

  Deirdre Wilson•Mind•2002

  Incluir item

• Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning

  Open Access•Konrad Paul Kording, Daniel M Wolpert•Nature•2004

  Incluir item

• The Personal/Subpersonal Distinction

  Open Access•Zoe Drayson•Philosophy Compass•2014

  Incluir item