Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When community forestry meets Redd

Has Redd+ helped address implementation barriers to participatory forest management in Tanzania

Bibliographic Data

ID2182485
AuthorsTom Blomley (Acacia Natural Resource Consultants Ltd, Reading, UK, corresponding author), Karen Edwards, Stephano Kingazi, Kingazi, Kahana Lukumbuzya, Merja Mäkelä (Niras Finland, Vantaa, Finland), Lauri Vesa (Niras Finland, Vantaa, Finland)
Year2017
Volume11
Issue3
Pages549-570
Publication date2017-07-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Eastern African Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1753-1055 • E-ISSN: 1753-1063
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17531055.2017.1356623
OpenAlexW2741630182
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited22

Tanzania has a progressive forest policy and legal jurisdiction for land and natural resource tenure, coupled with a strong decentralisation process that mandates village institutions with forest management responsibilities. Participatory forest management (PFM) has been a central part of government as well as a donor focus in the forest sector since the early 1990s. Numerous studies have been carried out by Tanzanian and international researchers to assess performance and synthesise experiences of PFM in recent years. The results are well documented, including the identification of a number of key bottlenecks to implementation and up-scaling. From 2009 onwards, a series of pilot projects were launched to develop and test local-level approaches to REDD+, all of which have now come to an end, and have recently been subjected to external evaluations. A central theme of many of these projects was the application of community-based approaches to forest and woodland management, building strongly on the legal framework for PFM. When REDD+ was adopted by the Tanzanian government as a new policy, feelings among civil society regarding how REDD+ might impact hard-won forest and land tenure rights were mixed. Some observers feared that REDD+ would stifle PFM and lead to a recentralisation of forest tenure by government, while others felt that REDD+ offered new opportunities for addressing long-standing bottlenecks and governance barriers to PFM implementation. Combining PFM with the specific goal of reducing forest carbon emissions has generated important lessons, some of which have the potential to strengthen the application of PFM in Tanzania and elsewhere. In some cases, we found that orienting PFM to REDD+ goals has helped address long-standing barriers to PFM implementation. In other cases, REDD+ has highlighted new weaknesses with current approaches to PFM, while elsewhere it has created problems where none existed before

Business · Civil society · Corporate governance · Decentralization · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Forest management · Geography · Government (linguistics · Natural resource · Natural resource management · Political science · Tanzania · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Finance · Forestry

  • Dissenting voices in a consenting village

    Philemon Kirunda Mukisa, David Mwesigye Tumusiime et al.•The International Forestry Review•2020

  • Forest management and conservation under the Redd + initiative

    Open Access•Amani J Uisso, Paxie W Chirwa et al.•SN Social Sciences•2021

  • Nexus of village land use planning, village land forest reserve and Redd+ in Tanzania

    Open Access•Amani J Uisso•SN Social Sciences•2022

  • Non-carbon benefits as incentives for participation in Redd + and the role of village participatory land use plans in supporting this

    Amani J Uisso, Paxie W Chirwa et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2021

  • Potential of Tanzania’s village land forest reserves in addressing the Sustainable Development Goals

    Amani J Uisso, Emmanuel R Lyimo•Development in Practice•2026

  • Do Community Perceptions of Forest Management and Conservation Vary Across Wealth Groups? The Case of the Kilosa Redd + Initiative in Tanzania

    Open Access•Amani J Uisso, Paxie W Chirwa et al.•Human Ecology•2023

  • How community forest management performs when Redd+ payments fail

    Open Access•Amy C Collins, Mark N Grote et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • What influences the implementation of natural climate solutions? A systematic map and review of the evidence

    Open Access•Ingrid Schulte, Juliana Eggers et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • The impacts of Redd+ on the social-ecological resilience of community forests

    Open Access•Reem Hajjar, Gretchen Engbring et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Cultural group selection and the design of Redd

    Open Access•Jeffrey Andrews, M B Mulder•Sustainability Science•2017

  • Socially embedding Redd+? A moral economy of leakage, corruption and agro-pastoral conflicts in Kigoma and Katavi regions, Tanzania

    Open Access•Emma Jane Lord, Parit Ole Saruni•Forest Policy and Economics•2026

  • Transnational Legal Process and Discourse in Environmental Governance

    Open Access•Sébastien Jodoin•Law & Social Inquiry•2019

  • Economic viability of community-based forest management for certified timber production in southeastern Tanzania

    Open Access•Gregory E Frey, Susan Charnley et al.•World Development•2021

  • Livelihood investments as incentives for community forestry in Africa

    Open Access•Susan Charnley•World Development•2023

  • An assessment of governance quality for community-based forest management systems in Asia

    Open Access•Tek Maraseni, Tek Narayan Maraseni et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Fragmenting forest governance

    Open Access•Emma Jane Lord•Political Geography•2025

  • Does Redd+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest Governance?

    Open Access•John Phelps, Jacob Phelps et al.•Science•2010

  • Failure by Design? Revisiting Tanzania′s Flagship Wildlife Management Area Burunge

    Open Access•Francis Moyo, Jasper Ijumba et al.•Conservation and Society•2016

  • Austere Conservation

    Open Access•Jevgeniy Bluwstein, Francis Moyo et al.•Conservation and Society•2016

  • Community forest management and Redd

    Open Access•Peter Newton, Brian Schaap et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • The politics of expertise in participatory forestry

    Open Access•Kathryn E Green, Jens Friis Lund•Forest Policy and Economics•2014

  • The Redd menace

    Open Access•Betsy A Beymer-Farris, Thomas J Bassett•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Where and How Can Participatory Forest Management Succeed? Learning From Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos

    Irmeli Mustalahti, Jens Friis Lund•Society & Natural Resources•2009

  • Promising Change, Delivering Continuity

    Open Access•Jens Friis Lund, Eliezeri Sungusia et al.•World Development•2016

  • Revisiting the Issue of Elite Capture of Participatory Initiatives

    Open Access•Jens Friis Lund, Moeko Saito-Jensen•World Development•2013

  • Are We Getting There? Evidence of Decentralized Forest Management from the Tanzanian Miombo Woodlands

    Open Access•Jens Friis Lund, Thorsten Treue•World Development•2008

  • When Participatory Forest Management makes money

    Open Access•Kaysara Khatun, Nicole Gross-Camp et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2015

Unique citing works16
Citations per year1,78
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae