Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Biden's Strategic Competition Approach Towards China

Bibliographic Data

ID21828599
AuthorsDanah Alenezi, Danah Ali Alenezi (Ministry of Health, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume20
Issue1
Pages64
Publication date2024-01-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1911-2017 • E-ISSN: 1911-2025
PublisherCanadian Center of Science and Education (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5539/ass.v20n1p64
OpenAlexW4392790194
LanguageEN
References cited9

Purpose- This paper aims to analysis and explore the causes of Biden's preference for the strategic competition approach to address China's threat. Design/methodology/approach- The paper relies on the offensive realism theory as the most relevant theory to examine the US polies and approaches towards China, or US-Sino strategic competition. In particular, the theory is suited to explore Biden's preference for the strategic competition approach, and not the hostile approach. As the theory contends that the great powers are rational actors do not engage in destructive wars if the balance of power is not in their favor. Findings- Since 2008 U.S perceives China as a most serious threat to its global hegemony. Obama and Trump's administrations have prioritized the strategic competition approach towards China, which aims at containing China's power smoothly without sliding competition to the level of severe hostility. Biden maintained this approach and also, reinforced it to avoid as much as possible major hostility with China. Through, for instance, rallying alliances and multilateralism. Based on that, the study suggests the U.S will prioritize this approach unless China upsets the existing balance by annexing Taiwan or taking full control of the South China Sea. Originality/value -The significance of the paper emanates from providing an in-depth analysis and explanation of the cause of the conflict or the cold war between China and the United States, and the main policies and approaches that the United States adopt to deal with China

Biology · Business · China · Economics · Industrial organization · Microeconomics · Political science · Strategic interaction · E-commerce and Technology Innovations · Global Political and Economic Relations · Ecology

  • US rebalance strategy to Asia and US-China rivalry in South China Sea from the perspective of the offensive realism

    Open Access•Danah Ali Alenezi•Seikei ronsō/Review of economics…•2024

  • The Belt and Road Initiative and China–US strategic competition

    Open Access•Minghao Zhao•China International Strategy Review•2021

  • Out of balance

    Open Access•Alexander Cooley•Melbourne Asia Review•2022

  • The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and China-U.S. Strategic Competition

    Open Access•Zongyou Wei, Yunhan Zhang•China Quarterly of International…•2021

  • China–US Strategic Competition and the Descent of a Porous Curtain

    Open Access•Jue Zhang, Jin Xu•The Chinese Journal of…•2021

  • Bolstering the Alliance for a Trilateralism‐Based Security Strategy for South Korea in Times of US–China Rivalry

    Open Access•Chang‐hee Nam, Sang‐ho Song•Pacific Focus•2022

  • The US–China Rivalry in the Emerging Bipolar World

    Suisheng Zhao•Journal of Contemporary China•2021

  • China-US rivalry

    Open Access•Xing Li, Li Xing et al.•Revista Brasileira de Política…•2021

  • Biden’s China Policy

    Open Access•Andrew J Nathan•China Report•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae