Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Engagement and Framing in the EU's Fair Transition Discourse

Bibliographic Data

ID21830469
AuthorsPietro Manzella (0000-0001-8785-1825, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue2
Pages14
Publication date2025-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of English Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1923-869X • E-ISSN: 1923-8703
PublisherCanadian Center of Science and Education (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5539/ijel.v15n2p14
OpenAlexW4408087180
LanguageEN

On 16 June 2022, the European Council approved Recommendation no. 2022/C 243/04 on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality. This recommendation encourages actions to safeguard people affected by the green transition, promoting quality jobs and facilitating access to proper working conditions while protecting health and safety. Importantly, this recommendation marks a move away from some previous documents—e.g., the Green Deal—issued by international and European institutions, which focused on a ‘just’ transition rather than a ‘fair’ one. As a result, it might be worth exploring the way this new fair transition has been framed, viz. how some aspects of this process have been selected and made more salient from a communicative point of view, in order to background certain dynamics while foregrounding others. In light of the above, this paper sets out to investigate the framing of the discourse featuring the recommendation on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality and the way the text was construed to fulfil certain communication purposes. In so doing, Entman’s four functions of framing—i.e., “defining problems, diagnosing causes, making moral judgments, and suggesting remedies” (Entman, 1993, p. 52)—will be investigated in the text in the context of the Appraisal Theory developed by Martin and White, in order to deal with “the construction by texts of communities of shared feelings and values, and with the linguistic mechanisms for the sharing of emotions, tastes and normative assessments” (Martin & White, 2005, p. 1). More specifically, this paper will seek to understand how the textual voice characterising this recommendation positions itself with respect to other voices and other positions. For the purposes of this study, the category of Engagement will be considered

Economics · Geography · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Chemistry · European Union Policy and Governance · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Biochemistry

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae