Constructive Trusts in Malaysia
A Methodological Reappraisal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21832787 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hang Wu Tang (0000-0001-7785-5144, Singapore Management University), Ying Khai Liew (0000-0002-6024-3579, The University of Melbourne) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 141-155 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1932-0205 • E-ISSN: 2194-6078 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/asjcl.2025.8 |
| OpenAlex | W4408719941 |
| Language | EN |
In recent times, Malaysian courts have resorted to a ritual incantation of unconscionability and the notion of a remedial constructive trust to justify a declaration of a constructive trust. This methodology is unhelpful for approaching constructive trusts and has led the law to develop in an unprincipled and unpredictable fashion. Our central thesis is that the key Malaysian decisions could have been decided on the basis of pre-existing legal principles upon which English and Commonwealth courts have declared a constructive trust. We argue that future courts ought to realign their methodology with the orthodox tradition of incremental development of the law in this area instead of resorting to broad notions of unconscionability and the remedial constructive trust
Business · Constructive · Constructive trust · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Legal principles and applications · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|