Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Progress, Continuity, and Constitutional Amendment

Envisaging Legitimacy in the pre-Global South's Quest for Modernity in China and Taiwan

Bibliographic Data

ID21832850
AuthorsMing‐sung Kuo (0000-0001-8400-0451, University of Warwick, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue3
Pages436-456
Publication date2024-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1932-0205 • E-ISSN: 2194-6078
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/asjcl.2024.17
OpenAlexW4405829841
LanguageEN
References cited6

This article compares constitutional amendments in China and Taiwan to explore the long shadow cast by the Chinese encounter with ‘modernity’ on their divergent constitutional roads. It observes that in China, preambular changes have been the characteristic of the amendments to the 1982 Constitution of the People's Republic of China , while the rule-conformity feature of Taiwan's multiple rounds of constitutional revision indicates that the preservation of the formal identity of the 1946 Constitution of the Republic of China is central to Taiwan's constitutional transformation. The article argues that the prominence of the preamble in China's constitutional amendments reflects the programmatic character of its socialist constitution, which is seen as an instrument for progress and emancipation through revolutionary forces. In contrast, Taiwan's rigorous observance of amendment rules underscores the pivotal role of legality in its constitutional development. Progress and continuity underlie the respective necessary legitimating conditions for constitutional amendment in China and Taiwan. Tracing the revolution-progress and the legality-continuity nexuses to the Chinese quest for liberation from Western imperialism, this article suggests that modernity guides both China and Taiwan in maintaining the legitimacy of their respective constitutions. China's path towards modernity tells a story of constitutional struggle in the prehistory of the Global South

China · Constitutional amendment · Legitimacy · Modernity · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · Law

  • The Fate of Judicial Independence in Republican China, 1912-37

    Open Access•Xiaoqun Xu, Xu Xiaoqun•The China Quarterly•1997

  • Accidental State

    Huang Lin, Hsiao-Ting Lin•Accidental State•2016

  • China's Core Interests and Dilemma in Foreign Policy Practice

    Open Access•Jinghao Zhou•Pacific Focus•2019

  • Constitutionalism

    Open Access•Giovanni Sartori•American Political Science Review•1962

  • A Tragedy of Good Intentions

    Open Access•William A Joseph, William Α Joseph•Modern China•1986

  • The Tragedy of the Chinese Revolution

    William B Ballis, Harold R Isaacs et al.•The Far Eastern Quarterly•1953

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae