Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Transplanting English Law in Special Economic Zones in Asia

Law As Commodity

Bibliographic Data

ID21832853
AuthorsIlias Bantekas (0000-0002-4207-2278, Georgetown University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume17
Issue2
Pages305-322
Publication date2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1932-0205 • E-ISSN: 2194-6078
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/asjcl.2022.19
OpenAlexW4296051652
LanguageEN
References cited23

English law has become a commodity for developing, resource-rich economies desirous of diversifying their economies. A small number of special economic zones, chiefly in the Gulf, but also elsewhere, have set up entire legal systems predicated to a large or smaller degree on English law. This transplantation is based on three distinct models, namely: (a) wholesale incorporation of statutes; (b) general reference to English law as residual law and; (c) implicitly, on the basis of the common law origin of judges appointed to the courts of special economic zones. The expectation in all these models is that the specialised courts and other stakeholders (eg, legal professionals) will apply English statutory and common law in conformity with other laws applicable in the special economic zones. Ultimately, the practice of the courts and other participants will give rise to a sui generis common law jurisdiction that is in dialogue with the courts and institutions of England and Wales. The article argues that this has already been achieved in the majority of the special economic zones examined here

Commodity · Common law · Conformity · Economic law · Economics · English law · Formality · Jurisdiction · Market economy · Political science · Statute · Statutory law · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Law · Law, logistics, and international trade · Legal principles and applications

  • Stakeholders

    Andrew L Friedman, Samantha Miles•Stakeholders•2006

  • The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’

    Open Access•Pierre Legrand•Maastricht Journal of European…•1997

  • Good Faith and Due Process

    Nudrat Majeed•Arbitration International•2004

  • Who Learns What from Whom

    Open Access•David P Dolowitz, DAVID DOLOWITZ et al.•Political Studies•1996

  • Why Legal Transplants

    Open Access•Toby S Goldbach•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2019

  • The Rise of International Criminal Law

    Kenneth Anderson•European Journal of International…•2009

  • Land grabbing in Southern Africa

    Open Access•R Hall•Review of African Political Economy•2011

  • The Resolution of Disputes Before the Singapore International Commercial Court

    Open Access•Man Yip•International and Comparative Law…•2016

  • Judicial Decision-Making and Transnational Law

    Open Access•Brian Flanagan, Sinéad Ahern•International and Comparative Law…•2011

  • The Costs of International Justice

    Open Access•David Wippman•American Journal of International…•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae