Numbers versus Rights in Low-Skilled Labour Immigration Policy? A Comment on Cummins and Rodríguez (2010)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2183532 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Ruhs (0000-0001-6376-2414) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 305-309 |
| Publication date | 2010-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-9888 • E-ISSN: 1469-9516 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19452821003688183 |
| OpenAlex | W1975068223 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 3 |
My paper for this special issue (Ruhs, 2010), which builds on analysis in a previous paper with Phil Martin (Ruhs and Martin, 2008), suggests the hypothesis of a trade‐off (i.e. an inverse relationship) between the number and some of the socio‐economic rights of low‐skilled migrant workers admitted to high‐income countries. Ruhs (2010) discusses the economic factors and mechanisms that may give rise to such a trade‐off and presents several brief case studies that, I argue, provide some illustrative empirical support for the existence of a trade‐off. As I make clear in the conclusion, there is ‘clearly a need for more systematic empirical research that includes a larger number of countries and that investigates alternative explanations of the relationship between the number and rights of low‐skilled migrant workers admitted to high‐income countries’ (Ruhs, 2010, p. 276) The paper by Cummins and Rodríguez (C&R, 2010) aims to provide this systematic empirical analysis. C&R conclude that their statistical tests ‘do not on the whole support the existence of a numbers versus rights trade‐off in immigration policy’ (2010, p. 283). The authors emphasize that the measurement of migrant rights and immigration policies is still at a nascent stage and that future assessments and better data ‘could, in turn, lead us to re‐evaluate the conclusions presented in this paper’ (p. 298). I consider the analysis by C&R unconvincing as a systematic empirical test of the numbers versus rights hypothesis for two reasons, namely: their conceptualization and measurement of the number of migrant workers in the context of this debate, and the indices used to measure the rights of migrant workers. I conclude with an outline of the systematic empirical analysis needed to advance the debate
Conceptualization · Demographic economics · Economics · Empirical research · Immigration · Political science · Employment and Welfare Studies · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
The New Migration and Development Optimism
The Openness-Equality Trade-Off in Global Redistribution
Martin Ruhs’ The Price of Rights
Opening borders and protecting migrants
Martin Ruhs’ The Price of Rights
Change of Paradigms? A Comparison of Canadian and Spanish Labour Migration Models
Democratic justice and status inequality in temporary labor migration
The Openness‐equality Trade‐off in Global Redistribution
Trading numbers vs. rights? Accounting for liberal and restrictive dynamics in the evolution of asylum and refugee policies
A Rejoinder to Ruhs
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,63 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2024 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |