Responsible Pluralism, Capabilities, and Human Rights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2183554 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jay Drydyk (0000-0003-0071-1921, Carleton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 39-61 |
| Publication date | 2011-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-9888 • E-ISSN: 1469-9516 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19452829.2011.541734 |
| OpenAlex | W2020851637 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 28 |
For their effective realization, human rights need to be perceived as culturally legitimate, and this in turn requires that they be justifiable pluralistically, engaging all reliable moral discourses. In so far as a human right calls for a specific capability to be respected, protected, and fulfilled, the capability approach can contribute to this task of pluralistic justification in two ways. First, it abstracts from particular goods to valuable functionings and capabilities in a way that affirms the particular conceptions of the good that value them. However, the model of justification adopted by Nussbaum—Rawls's reflective equilibrium—needs to be replaced by anchoring this discussion in knowledge of care and neglect. Second, Nussbaum proposes that equal entitlement to central capabilities can be justified on grounds of equal human dignity, which, as I read it, means that everyone's striving (or at least responsiveness) towards living well in the company of others matters, and matters equally. This affirmation of equal dignity, however, will be undermined if it is treated (as Nussbaum does) as a ‘purely political’ idea excluding public support from particular moral discourses. An alternative approach, responsible pluralism, enables us to enlist the support of all reliable moral discourses in support of equal dignity, rather than confining them to the background culture or the private realm
Capability approach · Dignity · Economics · Entitlement (fair division) · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Human rights · Law and economics · Neglect · Pluralism (philosophy) · Political science · Reflective equilibrium · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Value pluralism · Computer Science · Ethics in medical practice · Human Rights and Development · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology
Introduction
Honor and Human Rights
Clarification
Which Future for the Capability Approach?
Critiques and Debates
Core Ideas and the Framework
Introduction
A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue
Capabilities in a Just Society
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice
Human Rights and the Environmental Protection
From Critique to Action
What Does it Mean for Non-Human Beings to Have Moral Value? Building Bridges Between Capabilitarian Theories
Human Rights Trade-Offs in a Context of “Systemic Lack of Freedom”
The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach
Bibliography on the Capability Approach 2010–2011
Malnutrition in Mumbai Slums
A Critique of Liberal Universalism
Poverty as Capability Deprivation
The Clash Within
Identity and violence
Maternal Thinking
A Theory of Justice
Human Capabilities, Female Human Beings
Political Animals
The claims of reflective equilibrium
The right not to be hungry
Human Rights and Capabilities
Poverty and Human Rights
Development as Freedom
Making Sense of Human Rights
Inequality Reexamined
Durable empowerment
Human rights and international relations
Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements
Epistemology and Cognition
Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics
Human Rights and International Relations
Elements of a Theory of Human Rights
Women and Human Development
India and The West
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,27 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |