Unpacking tool criticism as practice, in practice

Thanks to easy-to-use data analysis tools and digital infrastructures, even those humanities scholars who lack programming skills can work with large-scale empirical datasets in order to disclose patterns and correlations within them. Although empirical research trends have existed throughout the history of the humanities , these recently emergent possibilities have revived an empiricist attitude among humanities scholars schooled in more critical and interpretive traditions. Replying to calls for a critical digital humanities , this paper explores tool criticism – a critical attitude required of digital humanities scholars when working with computational tools and digital infrastructures. First, it explores tool criticism as a response to instrumentalism in the digital humanities and proposes it to be part of what a critical digital humanities does. Second, it analyses tool criticism as practice, in practice. Concretely, it discusses two critical making–inspired workshops in which participants explored the affordances of digital tools and infrastructures and their underlying assumptions and values. The first workshop focused on games-as-tools . Participants in the workshop engaged with the constraints, material and mechanical, of a card game by making modifications to it. In the second workshop, drawing on the concept of digital infrapuncture , participants examined digital infrastructure in terms of capacity and care. After first identifying hurt in a chat environment, they then designed bots to intervene in that hurt and offer relief

Affordance · Critical theory · Criticism · Digital humanities · Empirical research · Instrumentalism · Unpacking · Digital Games and Media · Digital Humanities and Scholarship · Information Systems Theories and Implementation