"This is a deepfake!"
Celebrity scandals, parodic deepfakes, and a critically speculative ethics of care for fandom research in the age of artificial intelligence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21836668 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eva Cheuk-Yin Li (0000-0003-3076-3386), Ka-Wei Pang (0000-0003-3449-1875) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Transformative Works and Cultures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1941-2258 • E-ISSN: 1941-2258 |
| Publisher | Transformative Works and Cultures (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3983/twc.2025.2711 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Fans are increasingly aware of deepfakes—believable AI-fabricated videos—and are therefore more skeptical of unverified information, even when visual evidence appears convincing. This article offers a methodological reflection on analyzing a deepfake event in which fans produced and circulated AI-generated disinformation to playfully undermine the credibility of a celebrity's video scandal. We explore the complex human-community-machine interactions (HCMI) between fans and AI-generated images, and we discuss how researchers can ethically (re)present their findings. We call for rethinking the "fans first" principle, a core tenet of ethical fandom research. Drawing on Puig de la Bellacasa's technoscientific theorization of care, we propose a critically speculative ethics of care in fandom research, guided by three principles: (1) thinking with fans, (2) thinking for fandom, and (3) thinking beyond fans and fandom. This approach is particularly relevant in a digital media ecology where generative AI and fan practices mutually transform each other. Our discussion also serves as a springboard for further explorations of ethics related to AI, including its impact on trust, social relations, and data governance
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |