How (not) to talk about race
A critique of methodological practices in fan studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21836673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rukmini Pande (0000-0002-3438-727X, The University of Western Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Transformative Works and Cultures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1941-2258 • E-ISSN: 1941-2258 |
| Publisher | Transformative Works and Cultures (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3983/twc.2020.1737 |
| OpenAlex | W3034804903 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
Fan studies, a thoroughly interdisciplinary field, has drawn on methodological strategies from such fields as anthropology, literary studies, cultural and media studies, and psychoanalysis, resulting in a wide range of analytical frameworks and methodological approaches that highlight the different aspects of the fan communities being considered. Yet a lack of attention to how (unmarked) whiteness underpins these strategies has led to persistent blind spots regarding the operation of race and racism within these spaces. An analysis drawing from cultural and postcolonial studies highlights some of the ways scholars can overcome these gaps. Nonetheless, the logics of white supremacy continue to influence both micro and macro issues around research in fan studies
Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Performance studies · Racism · Sociology · White supremacy · Anthropology · Cultural Studies · Digital Games and Media · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Media, Gender, and Advertising
| Citations per year | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |