Effects of Grammatical Gender on Gender Inferences
Experimental Evidence From Italian Common Gender Nouns
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21838641 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elena Sofia Safina (University of Naples Federico II, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 60 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1948-5425 • E-ISSN: 1948-5425 |
| Publisher | Macrothink Institute, Inc. (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5296/ijl.v16i3.21824 |
| OpenAlex | W4399454609 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 17 |
Recent psycholinguistic research has focused on how different grammatical gender marking strategies affect people's mental representation of referents’ gender. Such works particularly explored how explicitly encoded linguistic elements, such as grammatical gender markers, may drive the inferential process as attentional clues. Results of reading comprehension tasks in French and German have shown that the explicit encoding of masculine gender in plural forms of role nouns often leads to a male bias, a specific masculine inference corresponding to the grammatical gender clue, even when the masculine form was intended as generic, thus including women and men. Moreover, comparing generic masculine forms with gender-fair alternatives revealed that the latter significantly reduce this male bias. The present study examines the impact of three gender marking strategies on the construction of generic mental representations. Indeed, the experiment tested generic masculine against two gender-fair forms (split masculine/feminine forms and ambiguous syntactic reformulations) among 38 Italian speakers. No significant effect was found in generating a generic mental representation through form manipulation. However, ambiguous syntactic reformulation realised by presenting target nouns from the Italian common gender noun class and through the neutralisation of determiners’ gender, increased the probability of a male-specific inference. Additionally, a keen interest in gender-fair language topics was linked to longer reaction times, indicating a higher cognitive effort during the inference process
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Comprehension · Grammatical Gender · Inference · Linguistics · Mental process · Mental representation · Noun · Plural · Politics · Communication · Computer Science · Gender Studies in Language · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies · Artificial Intelligence
When He Doesn’t Mean You
Generically intended, but specifically interpreted
Gender Doublets as a Mark of Gender Inclusive Language
Revisiting gender-fair language and stereotypes – A comparison of word pairs, capital I forms and the asterisk
Gender Representations Elicited by the Gender Star Form
How Fair is Gender-Fair Language? Insights from Gender Ratio Estimations in French
Grammatical gender as a challenge for language policy
The Scope of Memory-Based Processing
Gender Representation in Different Languages and Grammatical Marking on Pronouns
What is readily available during reading? A memory‐based view of text processing
Name Your Favorite Musician
Cyberostracism
What's in a (Role) Name? Formal and Conceptual Aspects of Comprehending Personal Nouns
The masculine form in grammatically gendered languages and its multiple interpretations
Models of understanding text
Altering Male-Dominant Representations
Gender Markedness of Language
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |