Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparative and Superlative Adjectives in Iranian Sign Language

Bibliographic Data

ID21838729
AuthorsZohreh Ghari (corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume14
Issue4
Pages141
Publication date2022-07-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1948-5425 • E-ISSN: 1948-5425
PublisherMacrothink Institute, Inc. (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5296/ijl.v14i4.20166
OpenAlexW4291140038
LanguageEN
References cited9

Comparison is an inseparable part of a language. It can be performed using various constructions in both oral and signing languages. English and Persian, for instance use affixes for comparative and superlative adjectives. Sign languages such as Australian Sign Language (Auslan), New Zealand Sign Language (NZSL), American Sign Language (ASL) and British Sign Language (BSL) employ affixes, use intensifiers and nonmanual features (by itself or along with a sign) to indicate a comparison. This research was aimed to investigate the constructions employed to make comparisons in Iranian Sign Language, Zaban Eshare Irani (ZEI). The findings indicate that, besides the aforementioned constructions used in other sign languages, excluding ‘affixes’, the main construction ZEI signers used was descriptive mode of discourse (e.g. Anker 2004), individually explaining the compared topics to clarify their preference. To a lesser extent, numbering, topicalization, and repetition were also used which mostly united together or alone in the same discourse. A similar construction was also observed for both comparative and superlative adjectives. This study opens a new window to comprehend the deaf people’s mind of thinking, and will benefit studies on language and linguistics, sign language interpreters and those that are interested

Comparative linguistics · Language interpretation · Linguistics · Philology · Sign language · Sociolinguistics of sign languages · Sociology · Superlative · Topicalization · Hearing Impairment and Communication · linguistics and terminology studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism

  • Comparison and universal grammar

    Leon Stassen•Comparison and universal grammar•1985

  • Comparative constructions

    Leon Stassen•Language Typology and Language…•2021

  • American Sign Language Syntax

    Scott K Liddell•American Sign Language Syntax•1980

  • The Linguistics of British Sign Language

    Open Access•Rachel Sutton-Spence, Rachel Louise Sutton-Spence et al.•Linguistics of British Sign…•1999

  • Comparatives in Turkish Sign Language (TİD)

    Open Access•A Sumru Ozsoy, Hüner Kaşıkara•Linguistic Discovery•2018

  • Basic Linguistic Theory

    R M W Dixon•Basic linguistic theory•2009

  • Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis

    Open Access•T A Van Dijk•Discourse & Society•1993

  • Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language

    Open Access•Valentina Aristodemo, Carlo Geraci•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2018

  • The realization of the linguistic metafunctions in a sign language

    Open Access•Trevor Johnston•Language Sciences•1992

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae