Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

France / United States, two responses to terrorism

Bibliographic Data

ID21844632
AuthorsMarc Sageman (Civil Service, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume2
Issue2
Pages284-295
Publication date2021-08-22
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLes Cahiers de la Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1958-3702 • E-ISSN: 2678-601X
PublisherCAIRN (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3917/cdlj.2102.0284
OpenAlexW3201872040
LanguageEN

U.S. terrorism trials are very different from French trials. There are multiple jurisdictions for trials and although la partie civile is not involved in criminal trial, it has recourse for compensation in civil cases. Federal criminal proceedings are adversarial, and the prosecution and defense are in constant negotiation as to charges and sentences. Terrorism trials are subject to special laws that criminalize material support for terrorism and carry enhance sentences for convicted terrorists. The guilt phase of the trial takes place in front of a jury, and lawyers from both sides ask questions of witnesses, with the presiding judge only addressing questions of law. Once convicted, a defendant faces a separate sentencing trial, which is often in front of a judge. After sentencing, convicted terrorists are subject to special measures isolating them and limiting their communications with the outside world

Adversarial system · Criminal law · Criminal trial · Criminology · Jury · Jury trial · Limiting · Negotiation · Political science · Terrorism · Computer Science · Criminal Law and Evidence · Engineering · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae