Two ancient classifications of sciences
Aristotle and Geminus
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21864916 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leonid Zhmud (0000-0002-4873-6442, S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 265-288 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | ΣΧΟΛΗ Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1995-4328 • E-ISSN: 1995-4336 |
| Publisher | Novosibirsk State University (NSU) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-1-265-288 |
| OpenAlex | W3125989042 |
| Language | EN |
The paper examines the division of cognitive space in Antiquity as exemplified by the two most influential classifications of sciences, by Aristotle and Geminus, which underlie all subsequent classifications of scientific disciplines until the 18th century. Aristotle, considering the mathēmata in their comparison with the “first” and especially with the “second”, physical philosophy, proceeds from the independence of all three kinds of epistēmai and strives to draw the most rigid boundaries possible both between them and within the field of mathēmata. Geminus’ classification reflects the far-reaching differentiation of sciences at the end of Hellenism, when almost all of them acquired several auxiliary disciplines, theoretical or applied, and when “mathematics” became synonymous with “science.”
Epistemology · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Philosophy of science · Pure mathematics · Sociology · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Philosophy and Science · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|