Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“Rhetoric Knows the Future Like God”

The Relationship Between Philosophy and Rhetoric According to a Byzantine Scholar of the 12th Century

Bibliographic Data

ID21865145
AuthorsDmitrii A Chernoglazov (0000-0002-8809-3090, corresponding author), Dmitrii Chernoglazov
Year2024
Volume18
Issue1
Pages131-147
Publication date2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueΣΧΟΛΗ Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1995-4328 • E-ISSN: 1995-4336
PublisherNovosibirsk State University (NSU) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.25205/1995-4328-2024-18-1-131-147
OpenAlexW4391854255
LanguageEN
References cited5

The problem of the correlation between philosophy and rhetoric, which was widely discussed in the late antiquity, regains relevance in Byzantium in the 11th – 12th centuries. The task of this article is to determine what position on this issue was held by Michael Italikos († before 1157), a Byzantine scholar, rhetorician and Neoplatonist philosopher. It has been already noted that in two of his works Italikos articulated two opposing views: in one he argued that philosophy is useless and far inferior to rhetoric, while in the other he exalted philosophy being capable not only of investigating abstract subjects but also of caring for the human good. The paper analyzes these and other texts in which Italikos argues about philosophy and rhetoric. It is demonstrated that Italikos awarded primacy to philosophy but also valued eloquence highly. It is concluded that the ideal of Michael Italikos, as well as other authors of that period, was a synthesis of philosophical thought and rhetorical elegance. Examples are given from his works, showing how this synthesis was realized in practice. This position is contradicted by only one small essay by Italikos, where he asserts the superiority of rhetoric over philosophy. This text, quite unusual in the context of the late antique and Byzantine tradition, is probably an example of rhetorical play that does not reflect the author’s views

Aesthetics · Art · Byzantine architecture · Epistemology · Literature · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Theology · Byzantine Studies and History · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy

  • With All Due Respect to Plato

    Michael Trapp•TAPA•2020

  • Proclus

    E R Dodds, Proclus Diadochus•The elements of theology•1992

  • Maximos the Confessor as a Letter Writer

    Open Access•Dmitrii A Chernoglazov•Античная древность и средние века•2022

  • Citations of Porphyry's against Aristides Preserved in Olympiodorus

    C A Behr•The American Journal of Philology•1968

  • Alexandri Aphrodisiensis Praeter Commentaria Scripta Minora

    Aristóteles Aristóteles, Ivo Bruns•Alexandri Aphrodisiensis Praeter…•1892

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae