Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Artificial Intelligence in the System of “Physician-Patient”

Anthropocentrism vs Technocentrism

Bibliographic Data

ID21865344
AuthorsDmitri A Izutkin (0000-0003-4423-3028, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue1
Pages149-157
Publication date2024-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanitarian Vector (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1996-7853 • E-ISSN: 2542-0038
PublisherTransbaikal State University (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.21209/1996-7853-2024-19-1-149-157
OpenAlexW4401055091
LanguageEN
References cited5

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming one of the priority areas of digitalization in various social spheres, where the medical industry is one of the most in demand. However, the use of AI in medicine raises a number of questions that require ethical and philosophical reflection. In particular, this concerns the relationship between the doctor and the patient from the point of view of traditional bioethical principles. The novelty of this research is the ethical and philosophical assessment of the use of AI within the framework of specific models of the relationship between a doctor and a patient. The problem is the tendency to reassess bioethical principles in modern medicine in the context of the use of AI. The purpose of the study is to reveal the contradictory nature of the relationship between a doctor and a patient in the use of AI. The hypothesis of the study: in the context of the use of AI in medicine, traditional historical values in doctor-patient communication (anthropocentrism) and orientation towards digital technologies (technocentrism) come into conflict. The research materials are the analysis of domestic and foreign literature on the stated problem. The methods are based on a dialectical method and a modeling method to assess the impact of AI on the doctor-patient relationship. Concrete results – the use of AI in the relationship between a doctor and a patient significantly affects the content of the basic principles of bioethics and can lead to their significant transformation in the era of digitalization in the field of medicine. Anthropocentrism, which has historically developed in doctor-patient communication, tends to be replaced by technocentrism within the framework of the use of AI. As prospects for the study of this problem, the need to solve issues at the technological, ethical and legislative levels should be highlighted

Anthropocentrism · Bioethics · Dialectic · Doctor–patient relationship · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Novelty · Political science · Psychiatry · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Digital Transformation in Law · Engineering · History · Law · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Should we have a right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Iñigo De Miguel Beriain•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2020

  • The Future Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

    Open Access•Torbjørn Gundersen, Kristine Bærøe•Science and Engineering Ethics•2022

  • The right to a second opinion on Artificial Intelligence diagnosis—Remedying the inadequacy of a risk‐based regulation

    Open Access•Thomas Ploug, Søren Holm•Bioethics•2023

  • Artificial intelligence and the doctor–patient relationship expanding the paradigm of shared decision making

    Open Access•Giorgia Lorenzini, Laura Arbelaez Ossa et al.•Bioethics•2023

  • Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making

    Open Access•Jens Christian Bjerring, Jacob Busch•Philosophy & Technology•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae