Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Discussion About the History of the Bosporus of Kimmeria in the Late 9th to 11th Centuries

Bibliographic Data

ID21866396
AuthorsAleksandr Aibabin (0000-0002-4116-8198, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume30
Issue6
Pages44-55
Publication date2025-12-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Serija 4 Istorija Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1998-9938 • E-ISSN: 2312-8704
PublisherVolgograd State University (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.15688/jvolsu4.2025.6.3
OpenAlexW7127370303
LanguageEN
References cited6

Introduction. Written sources contain contradictory and scant information about the Cimmerian Bosporus in the late 9th – 11th centuries. Analysis. Researchers of Jewish-Khazar documents published in 1912, 1913, and 1932 believed that Kerch (Bosporus) was the center of the Khazar province of Bosporus from the early 8th to the mid-10th centuries. Byzantinists, however, concluded that the city of Bosporus was returned to the Eastern Roman Empire during this period. Letter No. 97 of Patriarch Photius of Constantinople clearly indicates the subordination of the city of Cimmerian Bosporus to the Eastern Roman Empire no later than 868. According to N. Oikonomides, the mention of a strategos of the Bosporus theme in the Escorial Taktikon of 971–975 indicates its establishment in the second half of the 10th century. As the article shows, historians have often arbitrarily not only interpreted but also edited the text of John Skylitzes’s terse statement about the subjugation of a certain country to Khazaria in January 1016. This country (χώρα) could not have been located in Cherson, the Bosporus, Klimata, or the Azov region. John Skylitzes did not refer to Cherson as Khazaria in his work. He called the captured George Tzul the archon of the country of Khazaria, not the strategos of a theme. Results. Archon George Tzul, unlike the strategos of Cherson, George Tzul, and George Tzul, protospatharios of the Bosporus, did not hold the title of imperial protospatharios. According to the text of letter No. 3, sent by Metropolitan Michael Choniates of Athens to the tax collector Constantine Pegonites, Byzantium continued to control Cherson, Klimata, and the Cimmerian Bosporus around 1180

Empire · Fell · Metropolitan area · Byzantine Studies and History · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History and Cultural Heritage

  • The Theme of Bosporos According to Sigillography

    Open Access•Valerii Pavlovich Stepanenko•Античная древность и средние века•2022

  • Two notes on the early history of the thema of Cherson

    Open Access•Constantine Zuckerman•Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies•1997

  • Recherches sur l'administration de l'empire byzantin aux IX-XIème siècles

    Hélène Glykatzi-Ahrweiler•Bulletin de correspondance…•1960

  • An Unknown Khazar Document

    Schechter, S Schechter•The Jewish Quarterly Review•1912

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae