Ideology and Political Culture
The Intellectual Practice of Heritage Foundation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21868796 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kai Tian (0000-0001-8946-8424, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Pages | 236-242 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Social Science and Humanity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2010-3646 • E-ISSN: 2010-3646 |
| Publisher | EJournal Publishing (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.18178/ijssh.2022.v12.1097 |
| OpenAlex | W4311164166 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Think tanks is an important witness and symbol of American intellectuals’ response to the “climate of opinion” and ideological transformation during the Cold War. As a pioneer of civil think tanks and their transitions, Heritage Foundation, characterized by quick response, object-oriented research and Mandate for Leadership, symbolized the birth of advocacy think tank. At the same time, Heritage Foundation functioned as a mediator and practitioner of neo-conservatism, which merged diverse opinions into a more feasible plan. Relying on Ronald Reagan’s reform, during the 1970s and 1980s, Heritage Foundation turned the decision-making of American government towards neo-conservatism. The birth, development and practice of Heritage Foundation engaged implicit and explicit influence on the modern policy process, presenting a prism of a “knowledge-power” relationship
Conservatism · Environmental ethics · Ideology · Mandate · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Witness · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Law · Philosophy · Public Administration · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |