Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Principle of the Separation of Powers

The Ontological Presumption of an Ideologeme

Bibliographic Data

ID21870423
AuthorsGediminas Mesonis (Marymount University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume13
Issue2
Pages1-23
Publication date2020-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBaltic Journal of Law and Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2029-0454 • E-ISSN: 2029-0454
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.2478/bjlp-2020-0009
OpenAlexW3140493629
LanguageEN
References cited7

The theoretical materiality of the principle of the separation of powers is beyond doubt. This principle is inevitable in discourse on the constitutional framework of the state, democracy and the rule of law, and it has its own form of expression in positive law. Although the relevance of the principle of the separation of powers in social discourse creates the illusion of the conceivability of its content, the ontological questions concerning this principle remain largely vague. This can be explained by considering two aspects. First, as established in scientific doctrines and constitutional forms of expression, the principle of the separation of powers has become a social and legal ideologeme; it approximates an axiom which is no longer substantiated anew. Second, discourse concerning ontology is always complicated, since it calls to question the essence itself. It is complicated not only because it requires a particular intellectual effort and academic courage, but also because the outcome of such discourse is unpredictable and can lead either to the ideologeme being confirmed to be true or being unexpectedly revised, or perhaps can even lead to the demise of what has so far been self-evident, unquestionable, obvious, universally known, etc. This article analyses the ontological essence of the principle of the separation of powers – an approach towards the human being, whereby meaning is given to the consequent system of causal relationships within the whole theory. Discourse in this article takes ontological issues as its object of inquiry: why did we decide to separate powers and how many of these separated powers are there

Epistemology · Linguistics · Political science · Presumption · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Legal and Policy Issues · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • General theory of law and state

    Hans Kelsen•General theory of law and state•1961

  • The Second Treatise of Government

    John Locke•Democracy•2016

  • Le Conseil Constitutionnel

    Edward Mcwhinney, Louis Favoreu et al.•The American Journal of…•1981

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae