Learning medicine by the book

Reading and writing surgical manuals in early modern London

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21877482
AutoresElaine Leong (0000-0001-8129-4247, University College London, autor correspondente)
Ano2020
Volume5
Páginas93-110
Data de publicação2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBJHS Themes (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2056-354X • E-ISSN: 2058-850X
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/bjt.2020.7
OpenAlexW3111467743
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas29

Centred on Thomas Brugis's popular Vade mecum , or A Companion for a Chyrurgion fitted for times of Peace or War (1651), this essay considers the role of the instructional book in early modern surgical knowledge and practice. By tracing the fortuna of the Vade mecum from production to use, it shows that, far from being static texts, instructional books were dynamic objects responding and adapting to the changing needs of knowledge communities. I begin by situating the Vade mecum within surgical practice more broadly in early modern England, which shows the key role that the practices of translation and compilation played in the production of surgical manuals. Most producers of surgical manuals were practitioners-turned-authors, and their works typically drew on a mix of lived experience both at the bedside and in the library. Brugis, who was exemplary in this respect, was particularly interested in providing instructions for hands-on practices involved in surgical operations and medicine production. In the last section, which focuses on readers and users, I analyse annotations and additional writings in surviving copies of the Vade mecum to recover the agency of reader–practitioners and trace collective ownership of the book across time and space

Library science · Linguistics · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · History of Medicine Studies · Medical History and Innovations · Philosophy