Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Expert in the Field

Discovering the Traditional Borders of Late-Qing Geo-knowledge in the Himalayas

Bibliographic Data

ID21878181
AuthorsSayantani Mukherjee (0000-0001-5490-4572, Ashoka University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume9
Issue2
Pages379-403
Publication date2025-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Chinese History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-1632 • E-ISSN: 2059-1640
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/jch.2025.10044
OpenAlexW4416854212
LanguageEN
Citations received1

In the final decades of its existence, the Qing imperial state sought to unify and standardize policies of frontier management. In this context, mapping and surveying practices developed as socio-technological discourses that transformed how Qing authorities asserted their territorial claims in the Eastern Himalayas. Most scholarship on the history of Qing-era frontier management has tended to focus on Chinese nation-building practices. However, this article foregrounds the deconstruction of the epistemic regime governing the production of geo-knowledge about the Eastern Himalayas by investigating the appropriation and rejection of the interlocutors of local and indigenous knowledge, networks, and actors. How did military surveyors establish authoritative ideas about their own expertise? This article focuses on the late-Qing surveys of the Dzayul river basin commissioned by Zhao Erfeng and carried out by his subordinate officials Cheng Fengxian, Duan Pengrui, and Xia Hu. Between 1910 and 1911, Zhao Erfeng ordered new surveys of the regions located at the north-easternmost tip of modern-day Arunachal Pradesh, to demarcate the Qing Tibetan dominions and Chinese territory from that of British India. The surveyors Cheng Fengxian, Duan Pengrui, and Xia Hu, mapped the route of the Dzayul River which flowed into British Indian territory through the Mishmi hills into Assam as the Lohit. These surveys largely claimed that natural features marked the “natural” or “traditional” boundaries of the imperial state, against local knowledge productions that framed those same topographical features as connectors rather than dividers. By dissembling the various strands that informed this archive of Qing colonial knowledge, I investigate the processes by which state-produced narratives created new kinds of citational practices to designate who could be recognized as an “expert” of the mountainous geography of Tibet and the trans-Himalayan regions

Appropriation · Colonialism · Frontier · Indigenous · Scholarship · Traditional knowledge · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Indian and Buddhist Studies · South Asian Studies and Conflicts

  • River Crossings at the Yangtze’s Headwaters

    Open Access•Monia Chies•Human Ecology•2027

Citations per year1
Citation span2027 - 2027 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae