Approaches to prioritising primary health research
A scoping review
Bibliographic Data
OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify and describe approaches to prioritise primary research topics in any health-related area. METHODS: We searched Medline and CINAHL databases and Google Scholar. Teams of two reviewers screened studies and extracted data in duplicate and independently. We synthesised the information across the included approaches by developing common categorisation of relevant concepts. RESULTS: Of 44 392 citations, 30 articles reporting on 25 approaches were included, addressing the following fields: health in general (n=9), clinical (n=10), health policy and systems (n=10), public health (n=6) and health service research (n=5) (10 addressed more than 1 field). The approaches proposed the following aspects to be addressed in the prioritisation process: situation analysis/ environmental scan, methods for generation of initial list of topics, use of prioritisation criteria, stakeholder engagement, ranking process/technique, dissemination and implementation, revision and appeal mechanism, and monitoring and evaluation. Twenty-two approaches proposed involving stakeholders in the priority setting process. The most commonly proposed stakeholder category was 'researchers/academia' (n=17, 77%) followed by 'healthcare providers' (n=16, 73%). Fifteen of the approaches proposed a list of criteria for determining research priorities. We developed a common framework of 28 prioritisation criteria clustered into nine domains. The criterion most frequently mentioned by the identified approaches was 'health burden' (n=12, 80%), followed by 'availability of resources' (n=11, 73%). CONCLUSION: We identified and described 25 prioritisation approaches for primary research topics in any health-related area. Findings highlight the need for greater participation of potential users (eg, policy-makers and the general public) and incorporation of equity as part of the prioritisation process. Findings can guide the work of researchers, policy-makers and funders seeking to conduct or fund primary health research. More importantly, the findings should be used to enhance a more coordinated approach to prioritising health research to inform decision making at all levels
Appeal · CINAHL · Data science · Health services research · Information retrieval · Knowledge management · MEDLINE · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public health · Public relations · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Health Policy
Examining the Role of Health Services Research in Public Policymaking
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
Setting Priorities in Global Child Health Research Investments
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Approaches, tools and methods used for setting priorities in health research in the 21st century
Patient participation as dialogue
Engaging young African American women breast cancer survivors
The State of Health Policy and Systems Research
Eliciting policymakers' and stakeholders' opinions to help shape health system research priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region
Scoping studies
Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |