Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics

A scoping review

Bibliographic Data

ID21878519
AuthorsLaura R Garcia Godoy (0000-0003-2215-6463, Oregon Health & Science University), Amy E Jones (0000-0001-6122-9317, Oregon Health & Science University, corresponding author), Taylor N Anderson (0000-0002-8608-8343, Oregon Health & Science University), Cameron Fisher (0000-0002-3130-7625, Oregon Health & Science University), Kylie Seeley (0000-0002-0363-6069, Oregon Health & Science University), Erynn A Beeson (0000-0002-8936-3996, Oregon Health & Science University), Hannah K Zane (0000-0002-2045-7062, Oregon Health & Science University), Jaime W Peterson (0000-0001-9990-7128, Oregon Health and Science University Hospital), Peter D Sullivan (0000-0001-6567-4135, Oregon Health and Science University Hospital)
Year2020
Volume5
Issue5
Pagese002553
Publication date2020-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002553
PMID32371574
OpenAlexW3023614120
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited47

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages, requiring mask reuse or improvisation. We provide a review of medical-grade facial protection (surgical masks, N95 respirators and face shields) for healthcare workers, the safety and efficacy of decontamination methods, and the utility of alternative strategies in emergency shortages or resource-scarce settings. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of PubMed and grey literature related to facial protection and potential adaptation strategies in the setting of PPE shortages (January 2000 to March 2020). Limitations included few COVID-19-specific studies and exclusion of non-English language articles. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the evidence based on relevant healthcare settings to increase practical utility in decision-making. RESULTS: We retrieved 5462 peer-reviewed articles and 41 grey literature records. In total, we included 67 records which met inclusion criteria. Compared with surgical masks, N95 respirators perform better in laboratory testing, may provide superior protection in inpatient settings and perform equivalently in outpatient settings. Surgical mask and N95 respirator conservation strategies include extended use, reuse or decontamination, but these strategies may result in inferior protection. Limited evidence suggests that reused and improvised masks should be used when medical-grade protection is unavailable. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to critical shortages of medical-grade PPE. Alternative forms of facial protection offer inferior protection. More robust evidence is required on different types of medical-grade facial protection. As research on COVID-19 advances, investigators should continue to examine the impact on alternatives of medical-grade facial protection

Disease · Health care · Pandemic · Pathology · Political science · COVID-19 and healthcare impacts · Infection Control and Ventilation · Infection Control in Healthcare · Medicine · Nursing

  • Classification Schemes of Covid-19 High Risk Areas and Resulting Policies

    Open Access•Olalekan Abdulrahman Uthman, Olatunji O Adetokunboh et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Comparison of detection rate of 16 sampling methods for respiratory viruses

    Open Access•Nianzong Hou, Kai Wang et al.•BMJ Global Health•2020

  • Portrait of Montréal healthcare workers infected with Sars-CoV-2 during the first wave of the pandemic

    Open Access•Geneviève Fortin, Adrien Saucier et al.•Canadian Journal of Public Health•2023

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2020 - 2023 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae