The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21878703 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jenneken Naaldenberg (0000-0003-2675-4516, Radboud University Nijmegen, autor de correspondencia), Noelle Aarts (0000-0001-5134-4004, Radboud University Nijmegen) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 5 |
| Número | 12 |
| Páginas | e003858 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | BMJ Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908 |
| Editorial | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003858 |
| PMID | 33272945 |
| OpenAlex | W3110382977 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 17 |
Medical technologies, e-health and personalised medicine are rapidly changing the healthcare landscape. Successful implementation depends on interactions between the technology, the actors and the context. More traditional reductionistic approaches aim to understand isolated factors and linear cause–effect relations and have difficulties in addressing inter-relatedness and interaction. Complexity theory offers a myriad of approaches that focus specifically on behaviour and mechanisms that emerge from interactions between involved actors and the environment. These approaches work from the assumption that change does not take place in isolation and that interaction and inter-relatedness are central concepts to study. However, developments are proceeding fast and along different lines. This can easily lead to confusion about differences and usefulness in clinical and healthcare research and practice. Next to this, reductionistic and complexity approaches have their own merits and much is to be gained from using both approaches complementary. To this end, we propose three lines in complexity research related to health innovation and discuss ways in which complexity approaches and reductionistic approaches can act compatibly and thereby strengthen research designs for developing, implementing and evaluating health innovations
Bioinformatics · Biology · Confusion · Data science · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Management science · Medical research · Reductionism · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Biotechnology
Studying complexity in health services research
A system failure framework for innovation policy design
Dissecting Obesogenic Environments
The application of systems thinking in health
The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health
The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network
Systems science and systems thinking for public health
Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems
Using natural experimental studies to guide public health action
Complex Systems Thinking and Current Impasses in Health Disparities Research
Intractable Conflict as an Attractor
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,6 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |