Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21878703
AutoresJenneken Naaldenberg (0000-0003-2675-4516, Radboud University Nijmegen, autor de correspondencia), Noelle Aarts (0000-0001-5134-4004, Radboud University Nijmegen)
Año2020
Volumen5
Número12
Páginase003858
Fecha de publicación2020-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
EditorialBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003858
PMID33272945
OpenAlexW3110382977
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas17

Medical technologies, e-health and personalised medicine are rapidly changing the healthcare landscape. Successful implementation depends on interactions between the technology, the actors and the context. More traditional reductionistic approaches aim to understand isolated factors and linear cause–effect relations and have difficulties in addressing inter-relatedness and interaction. Complexity theory offers a myriad of approaches that focus specifically on behaviour and mechanisms that emerge from interactions between involved actors and the environment. These approaches work from the assumption that change does not take place in isolation and that interaction and inter-relatedness are central concepts to study. However, developments are proceeding fast and along different lines. This can easily lead to confusion about differences and usefulness in clinical and healthcare research and practice. Next to this, reductionistic and complexity approaches have their own merits and much is to be gained from using both approaches complementary. To this end, we propose three lines in complexity research related to health innovation and discuss ways in which complexity approaches and reductionistic approaches can act compatibly and thereby strengthen research designs for developing, implementing and evaluating health innovations

Bioinformatics · Biology · Confusion · Data science · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Management science · Medical research · Reductionism · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Biotechnology

  • Epistemic injustice in academic global health

    Open Access•Himani Bhakuni, Seye Abimbola•The Lancet Global Health•2021

  • Fine-tuning the practical relevance of a quality framework for integrated nature-based interventions in healthcare facilities. A qualitative interview study

    Open Access•Ann Sterckx, Ben Delbaere et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Negotiating with digital self-monitoring

    Open Access•Karine Wendrich, Lotte Krabbenborg•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2024

  • Studying complexity in health services research

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Chrysanthi Papoutsi•BMC Medicine•2018

  • A system failure framework for innovation policy design

    Open Access•Rosalinde Klein Woolthuis, Maureen Lankhuizen et al.•Technovation•2005

  • Dissecting Obesogenic Environments

    Open Access•Boyd Swinburn, Boyd Swindurn et al.•Preventive Medicine•1999

  • The application of systems thinking in health

    Open Access•David H Peters•Health Research Policy and Systems•2014

  • The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health

    Open Access•Harry Rutter, Natalie Savona et al.•The Lancet•2017

  • The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network

    Nicholas A Christakis, J H Fowler•New England Journal of Medicine•2008

  • Systems science and systems thinking for public health

    Open Access•Gemma Carey, Eleanor Malbon et al.•BMJ Open•2015

  • Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems

    Open Access•Ligia Paina, David H Peters•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • Using natural experimental studies to guide public health action

    Open Access•David Ogilvie, Jean Adams et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2020

  • Complex Systems Thinking and Current Impasses in Health Disparities Research

    Ana V Diez Roux•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • Intractable Conflict as an Attractor

    Open Access•Peter T Coleman, Robin R Vallacher et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2007

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,6
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2024 (4)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae