Levels and determinants of overprescribing of antibiotics in the public and private primary care sectors in South Africa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21878984 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mylene Lagarde (0000-0002-5713-2659, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author), Duane Blaauw (0000-0002-0605-7134, University of the Witwatersrand) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | e012374 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | BMJ Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012374 |
| PMID | 37524502 |
| OpenAlex | W4385412071 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 43 |
Although overprovision of antibiotics in primary care is a key driver of antibiotic resistance, little is known about its determinants in low-income and middle-income countries. Patient demand and financial incentives for providers are often held responsible for overprovision. Yet, inadequate provision exists in their absence and could be fuelled by quality of care issues and incorrect beliefs of providers regarding patients’ expectations. We explored these issues in the private and public sector in South Africa, by conducting a cross-sectional study using standardised patients (SPs)—healthy individuals trained to portray a scripted clinical case to providers—presenting with symptoms of a viral respiratory infection in a sample of public and private sector clinics. We linked data from SP visits to rich survey data to compare the practices and their predictors in the two sectors. Unnecessary rates of antibiotics were similarly high in the public (78%) and private sector (67%), but private providers prescribed more antibiotics at higher risk of resistance development. In the private sector, overprescription of antibiotics diminished when consultations were more thorough, but increased for consultations scheduled later in the day, suggesting contrasting effects for provider effort and decision fatigue. We observed differences in beliefs that could be responsible for overprescription: in the public sector, a majority of providers (nurses) wrongly believed that antibiotics would help the patient recover more quickly. In the private sector, a majority of doctors thought patients would not come back if they did not receive antibiotics. Overall, this evidence suggests that different factors may be responsible for the high overprescribing rates of antibiotics in the public and private sectors. Tailored stewardship interventions are urgently needed that tackle providers’ engrained habits and incorrect beliefs
Antibiotic resistance · Antibiotics · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Family medicine · Incentive · Political science · Primary care · Private sector · Public sector · Antibiotic Use and Resistance · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Quality and Accountability in Health Care Delivery
Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019
Prescribing, care and resistance
Prescribing practices for presumptive TB among private general practitioners in South Africa
Antibiotic overuse in the primary health care setting
How much healthcare is wasted? A cross-sectional study of outpatient overprovision in private-for-profit and faith-based health facilities in Tanzania
Undercover careseekers
Overtreatment and benevolent provider moral hazard
Addressing antibiotic abuse in China
Paying for and receiving benefits from health services in South Africa
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |