Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Using the multiple streams model to elicit an initial programme theory

From policy dialogues to a roadmap for scaling up integrated care

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21879463
AutoresMonika Martens (0000-0002-1432-0684, University of Antwerp, autor correspondente), J Van Olmen (0000-0001-9724-1887, University of Antwerp), Edwin Wouters (0000-0003-2268-3829, University of Antwerp), Daniel Boateng (0000-0001-7568-7298, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology), Willemien Van Damme (0000-0002-6344-3007, Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde), Van Belle (0000-0003-2074-0359, Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde)
Ano2023
Volume8
Fascículo9
Páginase012637
Data de publicação2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
EditoraBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012637
PMID37730245
OpenAlexW4386897771
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas66

INTRODUCTION: The 'SCale-Up diaBetes and hYpertension care' Project aims to support the scale-up of integrated care for diabetes and hypertension in Cambodia, Slovenia and Belgium through the co-creation, implementation and evaluation of contextualised roadmaps. These roadmaps offer avenues for action and are built on evidence as well as stakeholder engagement in policy dialogues. Roadmaps and policy dialogues are very much intertwined and considered to be key elements for successful stakeholder-supported scale-up in integrated chronic care. Yet, little is known about how, why and under which conditions policy dialogue leads to successful roadmap implementation and scale-up of integrated care. Therefore, this study aims to use a realist approach to elicit an initial programme theory (IPT), using political science theories on the policy process. METHODS: To develop the IPT, information from different sources was collected. First, an exploratory literature review on policy dialogue and scale-up definitions and success factors was performed, identifying theoretical frameworks, empirical (case) studies and realist studies (information gleaning). Second, research workshops on applying theory to the roadmap for scale-up (theory gleaning) were conducted with a multidisciplinary expert team. We used the intervention-context-actors-mechanism-outcome configuration to synthesise information from the sources into a configurational map. RESULTS: to include five streams (problem, solution, politics, process and programme) that can emerge, converge and diverge across all five policy stages. CONCLUSION: This paper aims to extend the knowledge base on the use of policy dialogues to build a roadmap for scale-up. The IPT describes how (dynamics) and why (theories) co-created roadmaps are expected to work in different policy stages

Business · Economics · Knowledge management · Management science · Multidisciplinary approach · Political science · Process management · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Computer Science · Diabetes Management and Education · Health Policy Implementation Science · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration

  • Country-Specific Roadmaps for Scaling Up Integrated Care in Belgium, Slovenia, and Cambodia – Lessons Learned from the SCUBY Project

    Open Access•Martin Heine, Monika Martens et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • The Science of Evaluation

    Ray Pawson•The Science of Evaluation•2013

  • Implementation, context and complexity

    Open Access•C May, Mark Johnson et al.•Implementation Science•2016

  • Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

    Open Access•Ray Pawson, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  • Making sense of complexity in context and implementation

    Open Access•Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Ansgar Gerhardus et al.•Implementation Science•2017

  • Realist Synthesis for Public Health

    Justin Jagosh•Annual Review of Public Health•2019

  • Knowledge co‐production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans

    Open Access•Jeanne L Nel, Jeanne Nel et al.•Conservation Biology•2016

  • Development of a theory of implementation and integration

    Open Access•C May, Carl R May et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Rameses II reporting standards for realist evaluations

    Open Access•Geoff Wong, Gill Westhorp et al.•BMC Medicine•2016

  • A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production

    W H Voorberg, V J J M Bekkers et al.•Public Management Review•2015

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Handbook of Public Policy Analysis

    Gerald J Miller, Frank Fischer et al.•Handbook of Public Policy Analysis•2006

  • Policy dialogue as a collaborative tool for multistakeholder health governance

    Open Access•Emilie Robert, Dheepa Rajan et al.•BMJ Global Health•2020

  • Scale-up integrated care for diabetes and hypertension in Cambodia, Slovenia and Belgium (SCUBY)

    Open Access•J Van Olmen, Sonia Menon et al.•Global Health Action•2020

  • Theory and Realist Methods

    Bruno Marchal, Guy Kegels et al.•Doing Realist Research•2018

  • Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy

    Russo M, Robert Geyer et al.•Handbook on Complexity and Public…•2015

  • What theory, for whom and in which context? Reflections on the application of theory in the development and evaluation of complex population health interventions

    Open Access•Graham Moore, Rhiannon Evans•SSM - Population Health•2016

  • Analysing power and politics in health policies and systems

    Open Access•Radhika Gore, R Parker•Global Public Health•2019

  • Bringing the state back in

    Open Access•Radhika Gore, Arthur M Fox et al.•Global Public Health•2014

  • A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research

    Open Access•Justin Jagosh, Paula Louise Bush et al.•BMC Public Health•2015

  • Building a middle-range theory of free public healthcare seeking in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Emilie Robert, Oumar Mallé Samb et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2017

  • The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries

    Open Access•Lucy Gilson, Nika Raphaely•Health Policy and Planning•2008

  • Key issues in co-creation with stakeholders when research problems are complex

    Open Access•Gabriele Bammer•Evidence & Policy•2019

  • The Manage Care Model – Developing an Evidence-Based and Expert-Driven Chronic Care Management Model for Patients with Diabetes

    Open Access•Patrick Timpel, Caroline Lang et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • How to Improve Integrated Care for People with Chronic Conditions

    Open Access•Liesbeth Borgermans, Yannick Marchal et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • K ingdon's “Streams” Model at Thirty

    Open Access•Pragati Rawat, John C Morris•Politics & Policy•2016

  • Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool

    Open Access•Maddalena Sorrentino, Mariafrancesca Sicilia et al.•Policy and Society•2018

  • Reconstructing Program Theories

    Open Access•Frans L Leeuw•American Journal of Evaluation•2003

  • Moving Policy Theory Forward

    Open Access•Michael Howlett, Allan Mcconnell et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2016

  • Scaling up in international health

    Open Access•Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies, L J Mangham et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2010

  • Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems

    Open Access•Ligia Paina, David H Peters•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • Evaluating health systems strengthening interventions in low-income and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Thomas Adam, Taghreed Adam et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • Realist Evaluation for Practice

    M Kazi•The British Journal of Social Work•2003

  • Retroductive theorizing in Pawson and Tilley's applied scientific realism

    Justin Jagosh•Journal of Critical Realism•2020

  • Comparing abduction and retroduction in Peircean pragmatism and critical realism

    Bridget Ritz•Journal of Critical Realism•2020

  • Participation in Policy Streams

    Open Access•Scott E Robinson, Warren S Eller•Policy Studies Journal•2010

  • Streams and stages

    Open Access•Michael Howlett, Allan Mcconnell et al.•European Journal of Political…•2015

  • Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process

    Open Access•Paul A Sabatier, Paul Sabatier•PS Political Science & Politics•1991

  • Deliberations about deliberative methods

    Open Access•Julia Abelson, Pierre-Gerlier Forest et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • Examining the Application of Retroductive Theorizing in Realist-Informed Studies

    Open Access•Ferdinand C Mukumbang, Eveline Muika Kabongo et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • What's in a Realist Configuration? Deciding Which Causal Configurations to Use, How, and Why

    Open Access•Esther De Weger, N J E Van Vooren et al.•International Journal of…•2020

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,5
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2024 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae