Implementation of the new WHO antenatal care model for a positive pregnancy experience
A monitoring framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21879571 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Samantha R Lattof (0000-0003-0934-1488), Amelia Castillo Morán (0000-0002-4826-1475, World Health Organization, corresponding author), Allisyn C Moran, Nancy Kidula (0000-0002-3447-244X, World Health Organization - Zimbabwe), Ann‐Beth Moller (0000-0003-3581-0938, World Health Organization), Ann-Beth Moller, Chandani Anoma Jayathilaka (0000-0002-0606-2216, World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia), Theresa Diaz (0000-0001-5063-8078), Özge Tunçalp (0000-0002-5370-682X, World Health Organization) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | e002605 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | BMJ Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002605 |
| PMID | 32565442 |
| OpenAlex | W3036280512 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 10 |
Monitoring the implementation and impact of routine antenatal care (ANC), as described in the new World Health Organization (WHO) ANC model, requires indicators that go beyond the previously used global benchmark indicator of four or more ANC visits. To enable consistent monitoring of ANC content and care processes and to provide guidance to countries and health facilities, WHO developed an ANC monitoring framework. This framework builds on a conceptual framework for quality ANC and a scoping review of ANC indicators that mapped existing indicators related to recommendations in the new WHO ANC model. Based on the scoping review and following an iterative and consultative process, we developed a monitoring framework consisting of core indicators recommended for monitoring ANC recommendations in all settings, as well as a menu of additional measures. Finally, a research agenda highlights areas where ANC recommendations exist, but measures require further development. Nine core indicators can already be monitored globally and/or nationally, depending on the preferred data sources. Two core indicators (experience of care, ultrasound scan before 24 weeks) are included as placeholders requiring priority by the research agenda. Six context-specific indicators are appropriate for national and subnational monitoring in various settings based on specific guidance. Thirty-five additional indicators may be relevant and desirable for monitoring, depending on programme priorities. Monitoring implementation of the new WHO ANC model and the outcomes of routine ANC require greater attention to the measurement of ANC content and care processes as well as women’s experience of ANC
Business · Geography · Health care · Implementation research · Monitoring and evaluation · Performance indicator · Political science · Process management · Psychological intervention · Computer Science · Delphi Technique in Research · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Nursing
Exploring Women’s Perceived Quality of Antenatal Care
Association between out-of-pocket health expenditures and low birth weight in Eastern Ethiopia
Differences in Antenatal Care Policies in England, Finland, and the Netherlands
Effect of antenatal care on low birth weight
Strengthening antenatal care services for all
Temporal trends in coverage, quality and equity of maternal and child health services in Rwanda, 2000–2015
Effect of antenatal care on birth outcomes in the Gambia
Cross sectional survey of maternal and newborn quality of care in Niger
Enhanced quality of nutrition services during antenatal care through interventions to improve maternal nutrition in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, and India
Community mobilization to strengthen support for appropriate and timely use of antenatal and postnatal care
Factors Associated with the Timing and Number of Antenatal Care Visits among Unmarried Compared to Married Youth in Uganda between 2006 and 2016
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |