Does adherence to evidence-based practices during childbirth prevent perinatal mortality? A post-hoc analysis of 3,274 births in Uttar Pradesh, India
Bibliographic Data
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practices that reduce childbirth-related morbidity and mortality are core processes to quality of care. In the BetterBirth trial, a matched-pair, cluster-randomised controlled trial of a coaching-based implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) in Uttar Pradesh, India, we observed a significant increase in adherence to practices, but no reduction in perinatal mortality. METHODS: Within the BetterBirth trial, we observed birth attendants in a subset of study sites providing care to labouring women to assess the adherence to individual and groups of practices. We observed care from admission to the facility until 1 hour post partum. We followed observed women/newborns for 7-day perinatal health outcomes. Using this observational data, we conducted a post-hoc, exploratory analysis to understand the relationship of birth attendants' practice adherence to perinatal mortality. FINDINGS: Across 30 primary health facilities, we observed 3274 deliveries and obtained 7-day health outcomes. Adherence to individual practices, containing supply preparation and direct provider care, varied widely (0·51 to 99·78%). We recorded 166 perinatal deaths (50·71 per 1000 births), including 56 (17·1 per 1000) stillbirths. Each additional practice performed was significantly associated with reduced odds of perinatal (OR: 0·82, 95% CI: 0·72, 0·93) and early neonatal mortality (OR: 0·78, 95% CI: 0·71, 0·85). Each additional practice as part of direct provider care was associated strongly with reduced odds of perinatal (OR: 0·73, 95% CI: 0·62, 0·86) and early neonatal mortality (OR: 0·67, 95% CI: 0·56, 0·80). No individual practice or single supply preparation was associated with perinatal mortality. INTERPRETATION: Adherence to practices on the WHO SCC is associated with reduced mortality, indicating that adherence is a valid indicator of higher quality of care. However, the causal relationships between practices and outcomes are complex. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02148952; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1131-5647
Birth attendant · Checklist · Childbirth · Environmental health · Health facility · Logistic regression · Observational study · Obstetrics · Odds · Odds ratio · Population · Pregnancy · Psychological intervention · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and fetal healthcare · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Nursing
Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980–2015
Generalized Additive Models
Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision
Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect
Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?
How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings?
The behaviour change wheel
An assessment of the impact of the JSY cash transfer program on maternal mortality reduction in Madhya Pradesh, India
Impact of packaged interventions on neonatal health
Where women go to deliver
Applying a framework for assessing the quality of maternal health services in urban India
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |