Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The WHO Global Benchmarking Tool

A game changer for strengthening national regulatory capacity

Bibliographic Data

ID21879783
AuthorsJAVIER GUZMÁN (0000-0002-8194-039X, Management Sciences for Health, corresponding author), Erin O’Connell (0000-0002-2850-3465, Management Sciences for Health), Kate Kikule (Management Sciences for Health), Tamara Hafner (0000-0002-4710-0979, Management Sciences for Health)
Year2020
Volume5
Issue8
Pagese003181
Publication date2020-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003181
PMID32784212
OpenAlexW3048872753
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited6

Many low-income and middle-income countries lack the capacity to effectively and efficiently regulate medical products in their countries. To support countries in strengthening their capacity, WHO has developed the Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) as the global standard for objectively assessing regulatory capacity for medicines and vaccines. The GBT is a game changer because it is the first globally accepted tool for assessing and strengthening national regulatory authorities. The inclusion of an institutional development plan in the GBT methodology provides context-specific actionable steps countries can take to advance their system’s functionality and maturity. The GBT facilitates coordination and improves the effectiveness of regulatory strengthening efforts. The tool also facilitates regulatory reliance and harmonisation, which helps to improve timely access to quality-assured medicines, and creates incentives for trade, particularly in countries and regions with a strong pharmaceutical manufacturing base. The GBT is a necessary tool for creating strong and effective regulatory systems, which are critical for ensuring the efficacy, safety and quality assurance of medicines and populations’ timely access to these medicines. In outlining the benefits of the GBT, this paper also offers some specific ideas for strengthening the GBT framework and process

Benchmarking · Business · Capacity building · Economic growth · Economics · Incentive · Political science · Process management · Public economics · Biotechnology and Related Fields · Computer Science · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting · Marketing

  • Nearly one in five essential medicines fail quality standards in Africa

    Open Access•Jean Christophe Rusatira, Manuela Dorado Novoa et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2026

  • Uncertainties about the quality of medical products globally

    Open Access•Patricia Kingori, Koen Peeters Grietens et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  • Strengthening regulatory systems for medicines in a changed world

    Open Access•Julie O'Brien, Rebecca Lumsden et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • How the concept of WHO-listed authorities will change international procurement policies for medicines

    Open Access•Cécile Macé, Lembit Rägo et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • Best practices in the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative

    Open Access•Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda, Samvel Azatyan et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2023

  • Addressing the challenges of regulatory systems strengthening in small states

    Open Access•Charles Preston, Murilo Freitas Dias et al.•BMJ Global Health•2020

  • Expanding global access to essential medicines

    Open Access•Lukas Roth, Daniel Bempong et al.•Globalization and Health•2018

Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae