Emergency preparedness and health system resilience assessment tool

Development and initial validation

Bibliographic Data

ID21880140
AuthorsFadi El-Jardali (0000-0002-4084-6524, American University of Beirut), Priyanka D Kanth (0009-0005-0684-9827, World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA), Priyanka Kanth (World Bank), Son Nguyen (0000-0001-8736-8454, World Bank), Son-Nam Nguyen (World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, USA), Sherin Varkey (World Bank), Denizhan Duran (0000-0001-7026-0447, World Bank), Rekha Menon (World Bank), Racha Fadlallah (0009-0006-1315-2822, American University of Beirut), Ammar Malek (Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA), Vageesh Jain (0000-0001-6817-1293, UK Health Security Agency), Majd Saleh (0000-0002-1222-9705, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Laura Buback (0000-0002-2698-8024, University of California, San Francisco), M J A Reid (0000-0001-6777-9619, University of California, San Francisco)
Year2025
Volume10
Issue8
Pagese016459
Publication date2025-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016459
PMID40789713
OpenAlexW4413108731
LanguageEN
References cited28

BACKGROUND: Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region has been one of the most significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The escalating frequency and complexity of global health threats-from pandemics like COVID-19 to climate change-induced emergencies-have elevated the imperative for stronger and more resilient health systems in the MENA region and the world over. In this paper, we introduce a tool designed to offer a comprehensive and engaging approach to assessing health system resilience and emergency preparedness and response capabilities, and articulate the tool's value add in the MENA region. METHODS: We developed the tool following a three-step approach consisting of (1) definition of purpose and scope of tool, (2) item generation and reduction and (3) testing for content and face validity given the MENA region's context. The Health System Resiliency Analysis Framework was adapted as the guiding framework for tool development. RESULTS: The tool offers a comprehensive and adaptable approach to self-assessment of health system resilience, using a multisectoral platform that enables continuous learning and improvement. The novelty of the tool resides in its potential to yield practical priority actions that need to be considered at all levels. The current version of the tool includes five components: (1) financing arrangements; (2) governance arrangements; (3) health system resources, public health and service delivery; (4) data and information systems; and (5) political and socioeconomic context. Each of the components consists of various subcomponents (22 in total). Each subcomponent is assessed using a mix of quantitative and qualitative indicators (99 indicators in total). On that basis, each subcomponent is scored to reflect the maturity of the country's capacity in that specific area. CONCLUSION: The proposed tool will address the limitations of the existing assessment instruments. We invite others to contribute with additional real-life implementation of the tool

Business · Economics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Preparedness · Process management · Psychological resilience · Public health · Computer Science · Disaster Response and Management · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research