Mental health and psychosocial support interventions for populations affected by ongoing armed conflict

A scoping review

Bibliographic Data

ID21880993
AuthorsStéfanie Fréel (0009-0009-0736-5364, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development), Janne L Punski-Hoogervorst (0000-0002-5762-2244, University of Haifa), Chris M Hoeboer (0000-0002-5991-1963, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development), Josef I Ruzek (0000-0003-4099-6431, Palo Alto University), Leisha Beardmore (Stanford University), Miranda Olff (0000-0003-1016-9515, Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group), Jana Darejan Javakhishvili (0000-0003-0196-7582, Ilia State University)
Year2026
Volume11
Issue5
Pagese022708
Publication date2026-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2025-022708
PMID42203434
OpenAlexW7162580583
LanguageEN
References cited102

Introduction Over 2 billion people worldwide are affected by ongoing armed conflict. The wide-ranging impact of conflict on populations’ mental health is well documented. However, less is known about the scope of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions implemented during periods of active armed conflict. This scoping review assesses the scope of published original articles and summarises existing evidence on MHPSS interventions for populations (civilians, internally displaced persons and veterans/ex-combatants) affected by ongoing armed conflict. It further outlines evidence gaps and proposed strategies to strengthen research and evaluation systems for MHPSS in these settings. Methods The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the framework for scoping reviews described by Arksey and O’Malley (2005) and followed the guidelines for scoping reviews provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, extension for Scoping Reviews (Tricco et al ., 2018). Results A total of 47 papers were included in the scoping review: 19 exclusively focused on children and adolescents, 14 exclusively on adults and 14 on both children/adolescents and adults. Across all population groups, only 12 papers investigated trauma-focused interventions. Many studies reported statistically significant positive outcomes in both adult civilians and ex-combatants with respect to decreased post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety symptomatology and improved psychosocial functioning, well-being and quality of life. Results were mixed in children/adolescents and when examining aggression, drug dependence and social/interpersonal skills in ex-combatants. Conclusion The wide heterogeneity of research designs, results and clinical instruments used to assess changes in mental health and psychosocial outcomes across studies indicates the need for improved research standards when evaluating MHPSS interventions in ongoing conflict settings

Anxiety · Mental health · Population · Psychological intervention · Psychosocial · Systematic review · Health and Conflict Studies · Migration, Health and Trauma · Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research